[rules-users] Best way to write a rule where pattern has multiple constraints

I was reviewing some of our DRLs and noticed some rules written like this: when RuleContext(billingSystem == "ABC") RuleContext(policyStatus == "active") RuleContext(renewalDueDate != null) then ... while others were written this way: when RuleContext(billingSystem == "ABC", policyStatus == "active", renewalDueDate != null) then ... There should only be one RuleContext fact in the knowledge base at one time. Which approach is better? Is one approach more efficient for Drools than the other? Does it matter? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Best-way-to-write-a-rule-where-pattern-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.