Re: [rules-users] Can I capture the result of an RMI call within a pattern?

That would be a good approach for one location. My real world rules are 24 rules for 24 different locations. If I used your approach, I think I would have to look up and insert all 24 locations for each session execution (we use stateless sessions) in order to have the 24 setter rules work. I am trying to avoid too many calls to the RMI service (remote database reads), which is why I was trying to put all the work into the one rule pattern. in my real-world rules, there are more conditions in the pattern than just the RMI lookup, so that only one of the setter rules will fire for each session execution. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-capture-the-result-of-an-RMI-call... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users