Re: [rules-users] Efficiency questions about DSL

So many questions.... I can comment on the workbench related aspects. The workbench only includes DSL files for authoring DSLR (or RDSLR) files that are in the same "folder" as the rule. I use the term "folder" as we don't support "same package" (which would imply if the same package existed in different JARs we'd include all DSL files - we do not). The "expander" keyword is, AFAIK, deprecated. DSL/DSLR expansion depends upon the files being in the same "folder". @Mario, @Mark, @Edson. Can you comment on whether KIE does handle DSL expansion across different JARs? Sent on the move On 18 Mar 2014 09:20, "mfalaize" <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4028841&i=0>> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering how to use efficiently DSL with my rules and I have > several > questions about it : > > - First, I have the impression that we can use DSL files only in the same > package of the DSLR file. When I tried to load DSL files by the > kmodule.xml > (specifying the different packages in the packages attribute of kbase) it > does not work. Do I have to load each DSL files programmatically or is > there > a way to load it automatically by the kmodule.xml (and if it is the case, > how can we handle the parsing order of these files ?) ? > > - An underlying question is is this a good practice to divide DSL files ? > I > would like to translate all my rules in french and to put the generic > translations in a unique DSL file to reuse it in all of my different DSLR > files. > > - I noted that we can use more than one DSL file for one DSLR file (it > works > at the runtime) but when it is the case the DRL viewer of the DSL rule > editor does not work and I don't have autocompletion. I tried to put > several > expander instructions but it fails. Is there a way to make it work ? > > I think DSL stuff is underestimate at this moment by the community and for > my last question I would like to know what is the future plans about this > feature ? Maybe I could help to develop it. > > Regards > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Efficiency-questions-about-DSL-tp402877... > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4028841&i=1> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4028841&i=2> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Efficiency-questions-about-DSL-tp402877... To unsubscribe from Efficiency questions about DSL, click here<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=... . NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=...