Re: [rules-users] How to track constraint truth [was: Non short circuit ANDing]

Thanks for the gentle reply. My initial reply was made without having read your latest example. The "experimental" syntax was what had me getting anxious, as I already have to fend off the Java developers that want to "just write the rules in Java" (i.e. they don't want to have to think in a non-procedural manner). As for the eval() of old, I thought that it was a discouraged practice to use it; precisely because it was considered to be non-normative in its approach. Again, it may have just been my interpretation of the documentation that was out-of-line with the mainstream thinking here. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-How-to-track-constraint-tru... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.