The answer to your question "is it correct that the activation-group
attribute cancel the rule itself from applying to other facts?" is yes
- this is the implemented behaviour.
It is, however, not quite the same as the documented behaviour
(Expert, Section 4.8.1., Rule Attributes).
-W
On 12/02/2013, pdario <dario.piantanida(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Can anybody help?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-th...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users