Yes, I tried QA analysis. But it only can find out the problems of the
individual rules like what you said. I tried to develop two rules with
sames conditions but different consequences and do the QA analysis, it
cannot detect it unfortunately. :(
2010/12/30 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try
it? As
far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc.
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @
http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @
http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require
> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation:
> X($f: foo)
> Y(bar == $f)
> as compared to
> Y($b: bar)
> X(foo == $b)
>
> And you can play this game at any level of complexity.
>
> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration of
> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in
> different agenda groups, etc.
>
>
> -W
>
>
>
> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com>:
> > The conflict is like :
> >
> > E.g.
> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10;
> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100;
> >
> > Can the BRMS detect this?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Please define "conflict".
> >> -W
> >>
> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.fung(a)redhat.com>:
> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created
> rules
> >> > in
> >> > the BRMS 5.1. Can the QA/Verify can check this out?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun <
> wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which
"features" and
> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you have
in mind.
> >> >> -W
> >> >>
> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com>:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule
conflict
> >> >> > checks?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Benson Fung
> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China
> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan
> Avenue,
> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell :
> 852-98369898
> >> > ||
> >> > benson.fung(a)redhat.com ||
http://www.hk.redhat.com||
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users