Re: [rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part of it). Best, On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there. > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR > > We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug. > > Toni > > Amit Kumar wrote: > > Sorry for spamming today > > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All > > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is > > there.. > > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it > > permits me to assign a variable to it > > like Equipment(eId : entityId) > > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability > > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue. > > Thanks, > > Amit > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Ok I tried again. :( > > > > In Equipment I only see manufacturer > > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer > > In Software I do not see anything. > > > > It contains many more classes > > > > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my > > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post > > it on alias > > > > Thanks > > Amit > > > > > > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>> > > > > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor? > > > > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> > > > > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that > > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this > > issue sometime back with 5.0 > > Thanks > > Amit > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar > > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Its coming from a JAR > > Thanks > > Amit > > > > Equipment > > entityId int > > partNumber String > > manufacturer String > > owningEntityId int > > > > > > > > Software > > entityId int > > OSType String > > OSVersion String > > imageName String > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EquipmentCA extends Equipment > > hostname String > > productName String > > productFamily String > > productId String > > > > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>> > > > > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using > > a Declarative Model? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola > > <trikkola(a)redhat.com <mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>> > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Its possible that there are some bugs in the > > snapshots. Can you tell me > > what your model looks like? > > > > Toni > > > > Amit Kumar wrote: > > > The latest builds seem to be no good for > guvnor > > > They do seem rich in features .. especially > > support for > > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with > > inbox and global packages. > > > > > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the > > when/then clause then all the > > > attributes of the facts are not coming .. > > some attributes come.. not > > > all of them. > > > I am picking it from here > > > > > > https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t... > > > Any other place I can look :) > > > > > > Thanks > > > Amit > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar > > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto: > amitkumar(a)gmail.com&gt; > > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Jervis!! > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, > > Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com> > > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > A new feature called "Sharable > > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be > > > available in Drools 5.1. This > > feature allows you share an > > > asset among > > > different packages. It also creates > > a global area (you can > > > consider it > > > as a global package). Potentially > > you can promote an asset > > > that you > > > think is more appropriate to be > > defined in a global scope from > > > your > > > current package to the global area, > > so that this global asset > > > can be > > > reused by every package. This > > feature is already on trunk, > > > maybe you > > > want to give it a try. Any comments > > or feedbacks will be highly > > > appreciated. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jervis > > > > > > > > > Amit Kumar wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > I am looking to organize the rules > > in different categories. > > > But for > > > > distribution purposes We are > > creating packages for different > > > > roles/processing phases > > > > > > > > So a rule will reside in one > > pckage but for navigation it > > > can belong > > > > to multiple categories > > > > > > > > So packages are like Shirts, > > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters > > > > Categories are Color, Material, > > Size, Gender and those have sub > > > > categories witin them > > > > > > > > We have rules which will device > > the category of the item > > > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", > > "cloth rule", leather rule" > > > > > > > > Now the problem we are facing is > > for category rules is if I > > > define the > > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I > > will not be able ot use it > > > in Pant > > > > package.. Will have to redefine it. > > > > > > > > The other problem in this scenario > > is If I have a price rule > > > in Shirt > > > > package and the category is "Blue > > Color" and "XL Size" then > > > I will > > > > have to put it in both categories > > > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on > > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule" > > > on "XL > > > > Category" and I put the rule in > > both categories.. will it > > > be an "and" > > > > relationship or will be an "OR" > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Amit > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > rules-users mailing list > > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rules-users mailing list > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>> > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rules-users mailing list > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > -- > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > > > Esteban Aliverti > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > -- > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > > > Esteban Aliverti > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Esteban Aliverti _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users