On 18/03/2014, gboro54 <gboro54(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That is correct and that is my thought. My company I feel likes to
over
complicate things at times. My thought would be to use drools queries to
handle the searching of previous cases for the solution. Does that seem
like
a reasonable approach?
I'd have to see a few solid use cases before I really pledge my
reputation. I'm not sure how queries can rescue the day, but I think I
could come up with a nice set of technical rules (but see 1st
sentence).
-W
laune wrote
> CBR as in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case-based_reasoning?
>
> If the number of identical variables, added with weights, is the
> target function, a simple search strategy should be sufficient for
> finding the best past case.
>
> -W
>
>
> On 18/03/2014, gboro54 <
> gboro54@
> > wrote:
>> This sounds like something that could be accomplished with Planner. Is
>> that
>> the case or am I completely off the mark here? My company is looking at
>> technologies to do case base planning and since we already use drools
>> for
>> other business rules figure I would poke around
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>>
> rules-users@.jboss
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@.jboss
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Case-Based-Reasoning-tp4028784p4...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users