Hi Edson, thanks for the update. Any specific reason why this is so? Because
as a general convention in Java, we tend to use global declarations in any
constructs across. It would be a good thing to have.
On 7/2/07, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
Natraj,
Globals were not designed to be available in functions, unless they are
sent in as parameters in the way you did in your second example.
[]s
Edson
2007/7/2, Natraj Gudla <natraj.gudla(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using Drools 3.0.6. While using a global variable in a function,
> the compiler complains it cannot resolve the global variable name. Something
> like below
>
> *
>
> global
> *com.*sample*.ExampleLogger *customLogger*;*
>
> function
> **void* logMessage(String msg){
>
> customLogger.logMessage("Log Message from the function");
>
> }
> In the above code, it complains "customLogger cannot be resolved". I am
> able to refer the global in the consequence of a rule directly. What is the
> problem using the reference within a function.
> On the other hand, i am able to do something like
> * *
>
> function *void* logMessage(ExampleLogger custLogger,String msg){
>
> custLogger.logMessage(msg+
> " Accept gloabal as function parameter");
>
> }
> and call from the consequence of a rule : logMessage(customLogger); //
> I am passing the global to the function as an argument and then use it to
> log a message.
> This way is working. But not the first way of using the global in the
> function.
>
> Any help??
>
> Thanks
> --
> Natraj Gudla
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users