Re: [rules-users] Excel Syntax in Decision Tables
As the documentation tries to explain, there are four rows in the
heading of acondition column.
1 The first contains CONDITION (or condition).
2 The second defines the class for a Pattern.
3 The third one contains a constraint.
4 The fourth is for a comment.
So, use
fatca: FATCA(); Classification()
for the second one and
type == $param
for the fourth one.
-W
On 26/05/2014, crosbis2 <drpatrick.cosmo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry to disturb the forum with this one.
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4029686/FATCA1.png>
I want to replicate this code in a decision table. There is a parse
exception when i try to convert a table due to the code fatca : FATCA()
i.e. There is Fatca [Fatca] even though the rule validates ok.
I know it is a pattern with no condition attached. so i tried putting it
with the actual condition and also making it standalone with condition
null.
neither will convert to a decision table even though the syntax looks
correct from the view source?
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4029686/FATCA2.png>
Anyone any ideas on what i need to do for this problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Excel-Syntax-in-Decision-Tables-tp40295...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
