Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution

From: techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 2:44 PM Thanks Greg and Joe. I think i should have mentioned this before. I can also have other parent rule node in the tree structure which tests against same fact. Each parent rule node should only control its child rule nodes, but not other parent rule node and child rule node. If I do retract, won't it affect other parent rule node? Greg Barton wrote: > > You may consider the other suggestion of retracting the fact(s) that would > trigger the child rule. It's the more "natural" way of going about it. > > What's driving this design choice? > > --- On Fri, 10/31/08, techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> From: techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com&gt; >> Subject: Re: [rules-users] controling rule execution >> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 8:24 AM >> Thanks Greg. >> child rule should be reactivated if parent's conditions >> for some other fact >> are false. >> this should happen for each fact. Parent's condition >> should decide whether >> child rule should be executed or not for each fact. If >> parent's conditions >> are true, then don't execute child rule and vice versa. >> >> >> Greg Barton wrote: >> > >> > A combination of higher priority parent rules with a >> custom agenda filter, >> > activated when the parent rule fires, that prevents >> the child rule from >> > firing. >> > >> > Just a guess. >> > >> > So, after the child rule is initially prevented from >> firing, can it be >> > reactivated? If so, when and under what conditions? >> > >> > --- On Thu, 10/30/08, techy >> <techluver007(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > >> >> From: techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >> Subject: [rules-users] controling rule execution >> >> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> >> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 11:18 PM >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I would like to have the rules parent/child >> structure. I >> >> don't want the >> >> child rules to be executed when parent's >> conditions >> >> are true(i.e >> >> consequence is executed) even if child's >> conditions >> >> are true. How Can I >> >> achieve that in drools? >> >> Please clarify. >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20260028.html >> >> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive >> at >> >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> rules-users mailing list >> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20265921.html >> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20272962.html Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users