Hi,
I am not entirely sure about 5.3, but you certainly could escape pure DRL
phrases during DSL and DSLR parsing in V5.1. It would surprise me if they
threw that out.
You could escape a DRL line by using 'greater than' >
Regards,
Frank
gboro54 wrote
That is what I thought... I was hoping we would be able to write a rule
using a combination of our DSL and rule syntax
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-DSL-and-DRL-tp3524786p352513...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.