JPA is just a wrapper to the marshaller adding transactions and persistence.
Mark
On 23 Nov 2012, at 14:18, magnusv <magnus.vojbacke(a)digitalroute.com> wrote:
Are there any disadvantages to using the Marshaller instead of JPA
for
persistence?
We are running Drools as an embedded service, and we would favor the
Marshaller because we don't want to handle the persisting of the session id
between system reboots. We're currently not using JPA in our system, and it
seems unnecessary to add it just for Drools.
In which scenarios would it be appropriate to use JPA and Marshalling
respectively?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persisten...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users