Paul Sentosa wrote:
Hi,
Mark, thanks for the links and explanation.
So if I use Guvnor for administrating my rules,
- should I use the URL pointing to LATEST.DRL in change-set instead of
the one in package snapshot to get the latest version of rules?
- I assume the communication between my application and the Guvnor
will happen by the time applyChangeSet-method (which defines a
resource by pointing to the URL of DRL) is called and internally
create package out of it (compared to the method
newRuleAgent("properties"). Is this correct? Is there any significat
difference in required time/performance?
I added file scanning, I haven't yet
added http scanning, I'll do that
this week. the file and http scanning, work in the same manner as they
do for the original rule agent. If you look at the file scanner now, you
can see how to implement your own if you really need to. The framework
is now designed that people can built their own resource monitors, so
they can implement their own push based implementations.
Mark
Again, thanks and appreciate your answer
Regards
Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
*To:* Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:22:22 AM
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] How to use KnowledgeAgent in the "old
manner" (just like RuleAgent)
psentosa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone give some explanation / examples on this? The docu is
still using
> ruleagent.
> I found some piece of codes within the KnowledgeAgentFactory, but I
saw that
> it uses the configuration object.
The javadocs:
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
There are a number of unit tests you can follow:
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/t...
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/t...
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-decisiontables...
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-decisiontables...
> I personally prefer the old style by using
> a property file in which the configuration is defined.
>
The properties file does not offer enough flexibilility to support all
resource types - the xml really is quite simple - how do you specify
the worksheet name for a decision tree? In some ways it's actually
simpler and more powerful, as there is no separate line for
directories, it's just another resource and it detects that it's a
directory. ChangeSets will eventually support remove and modify, for
incremental knowledgebase changes, so the properties file just doesn't
cut it.
<change-set>
<add>
<resource
source='http://www.domain.com/test.drl'
<
http://www.domain.com/test.drl%27> type='DRL' />
<resource source='file://data/somedir' type='DRL' />
<resource
source='http://www.domain.com/test.xls'
<
http://www.domain.com/test.xls%27> type='DTABLE' >
<decisiontable-conf worksheet-name='sheet10' input-type='XLS'
/>
</resource>
</add> </change-set>
Mark
> Thanks in advance for any help
>
> Regards
> Paul
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users