Re: [rules-users] Update function usage for java objects to be retrieved for database update

I will start by pointing out that I am new to drools also.... So, take what I say with a grain of salt... With that I am curious about your question... Since each rule updates only one property, you need all rules to fire but not fire again immediately after it fired... Could you use the no loop? What is the reasoning for writing a single rule for each property? could you not write the rules in a way to set the object as a whole? Might not be much help, but interesting situation to me... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Update-function-usage-for-java-objects-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.