RE: [rules-users] Assistance with DSL syntax

I think there was an API change for 4.0.x - "retract" became "retractObject". ________________________________ From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Christopher.Mathrusse(a)sybase.com Sent: 13 September 2007 02:18 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Assistance with DSL syntax I was just looking for a more "short hand" syntax, one where I would not need to declare "theOrder". On the same subject though, I compiled my rules with the DRL/DSL editors in Eclipse (very nice by the way) and I am getting a compilation error being caused by my DSL entry: [consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder); It seems that there is an issue with the retract(theOrder);statement. The method retract(Order) is undefined for the type Rule_Maximum_Order_Amount_Exceeded_0 Might you have any idea as to why this would be occurring or exactly what the message is meaning? Thanks for the help... "Edson Tirelli" <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org 09/12/2007 05:55 PM Please respond to Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; To "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; cc Subject Re: [rules-users] Assistance with DSL syntax Yes, that is correct. Why do you mean by a "cleaner" way? []s Edson 2007/9/12, Christopher.Mathrusse(a)sybase.com <mailto:Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com> <Christopher.Mathrusse(a)sybase.com <mailto:Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com> >: I'm using a DSL with my DRL file and I've read through the documentation but I've gotten hung-up on the syntax. Below is a rule from my DRL and the expansion in my DSL. My rule in the DRL: rule "Maximum Order Amount Exceeded" salience 9800 when There is an Order with - an amount that exceeds 100000 then Manually release the Order end My DSL: [condition][]There is an Order with=Order() [condition][]- an amount that exceeds {number}=amount >= {number} [consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName()); What I would like to do is add to my consequence the following in red: [consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder); I know that I would need to modify my condition statement to be able to use the variable theOrder in my call to retract: [condition][]There is an Order with=theOrder : Order() but is there a cleaner way to achieve this? _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com/> _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users