Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession
We've been through this kind of discussion time and again...
Check whether procedural programming isn't better suited for your task
whenever you shy away from the requirements and benefits of a rule
based solution.
And see the section on "Fact Classification" in my whitepaper:
https://engage.redhat.com/forms/rule-design-patterns
-W
On 13/02/2013, pdario <dario.piantanida(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, it's not clear.
Do you mean I have to add a condition in each rule to check whether other
discount have been already applied?
Even so, I can I control the preferred order of the discounts without
salience? Do I have to put negated conditions of each rule??
It looks cumbersome...
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-th...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users