Re: [rules-users] Matching consecutive events

Welcome back, Wolfgang! I really missed your timely responses... The amount of 3 events needed for activation is not an assumption, but a fact. When using the NOT-clause the rule triggers first at the arrival of a 3rd event (HINT), otherwise at the second. There is no further processing (retraction) applied. Thank you Jaro -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-consecutive-events-tp4018980p4... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.