Op 05-02-13 17:24, john poole schreef:
Better than other algorithms is what I'm after.
The output from the sample data sets is excellent. So easy to scan through
and understand all the results immediately. Anyone that hasn't used it
should give it a try.
Thanks for the kind words :)
I'm running the benchmarker on my inputs and rules now. I'm just using the
Nurse Rostering example with different inputs and a few more rules, but it's
been taking me around 6 hours to get the score I expect.
That's long indeed.
Could be the difficulty of your dataset. Or could be
the performance of your score rules.
What's your average calculate count per second (see log or benchmarker
report).
It should be 2 000 - 10 000 at least.
I'm also using planner to try and show cases where an acceptable solution
can't be found, and I'll be more confident knowing I'm tried all the
methods.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Found-solution-vs-actual-optimum-tp4022...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users