Sounds like a bug, please read "getting involved" and submit a uni test and jira: http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-... Mark On 18/05/2012 16:03, Stathis Rouvas wrote: > Hello List, > > I recently migrated from Drools.5.0.1 to Drools.5.4.0 and I am having > issues when combining constraints with OR when custom operators are > involved. > > For example, the following rule: > > rule "r548695.1" > no-loop true > dialect "mvel" > when > gnId : GN() > la : t547147( ) > v1717 : Tra48( gnId.gNo==gNo , name F_str[startsWith] la.c547148 || > postCode F_str[contains] la.c547149 ) > then > System.out.println("Rule r548695.1 fired"); > end > > results in the following exception: > > Unable to Analyse Expression gnId.gNo == gNo&& ( F_str0.evaluate( name, > la.c547148 ) || F_str1.evaluate( postCode, la.c547149 ) ): > [Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode: > my.package.rulez.Tra48.F_str0()] > [Near : {... gNo == gNo&& ( F_str0.evaluate( name, la.c54 ....}] > ^ : [Rule name='r548695.1'] > > Please note, that the same rule using AND (&&) between the custom > operators compiles OK. > > The above rule had not problem whatsoever in Drools.5.0.1. > > Any ideas to overcome this issue, are most welcomed. > > -Stathis > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users