4:15 p.m.
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence) on the data that
gets stored as part of the org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a JPA Entity(stored in
its own table) to a session.startProcess("", map) and map this entity variable
to a parameter in the work item node - then this entity will get stored in the
WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo - is there
somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so that it doesn't gets stored
twice?
Thanks
Vijay
4:30 p.m.
New subject: Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
If "a" is correct - may be I can customize the "JPAWorkItemManager"
for my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Vijay K Pandey
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence) on the data that
gets stored as part of the org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a JPA Entity(stored in
its own table) to a session.startProcess("", map) and map this entity variable
to a parameter in the work item node - then this entity will get stored in the
WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo - is there
somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so that it doesn't gets stored
twice?
Thanks
Vijay
4:40 p.m.
Hmm .. for what I remember the variables if are configured to be persisted
using JPA using the Strategies, probably are externalized. Are you sure that
are not being persisted with variable persistence strategy rigth now?
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>
If “a” is correct – may be I can customize the “JPAWorkItemManager”
for
my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Vijay K Pandey
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo
Entity
I have a question related to the (*Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence*) on
the data that gets stored as part of the *
org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.*
* *
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy – and I pass a JPA
Entity(stored in its own table) to a *session.startProcess*(“”, map) and
map this entity variable to a parameter in the work item node – then this
entity will get stored in the WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized
form in the column (workItemByteArray). So if that is true we have got the
same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If “a” is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo – is
there somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo – so that it
doesn’t gets stored twice?
Thanks
Vijay
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
5:40 p.m.
New subject: Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
The JPA entity is getting stored properly in its own table through variable persistent
strategy - but will the same entity also get stored as part of the serialized form in the
column (workItemByteArray) of entity WorkItemInfo.
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Mauricio Salatino
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:40 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
Hmm .. for what I remember the variables if are configured to be persisted using JPA using
the Strategies, probably are externalized. Are you sure that are not being persisted with
variable persistence strategy rigth now?
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey@mdes.ms.gov<mailto:VPandey@mdes.ms.gov>>
If "a" is correct - may be I can customize the "JPAWorkItemManager"
for my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From:
rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
On Behalf Of Vijay K Pandey
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence) on the data that
gets stored as part of the org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a JPA Entity(stored in
its own table) to a session.startProcess("", map) and map this entity variable
to a parameter in the work item node - then this entity will get stored in the
WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo - is there
somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so that it doesn't gets stored
twice?
Thanks
Vijay
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
5:47 p.m.
I don't think so, I don't have the code here, but for what I remember all
the contextInstances that contains variables are scanned in order to
expternalize the variable persistence.
I will take a look at that when I have the code handy.
Greetings.
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>
The JPA entity is getting stored properly in its own table through
variable persistent strategy – but will the same entity also get stored as
part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray) of entity
WorkItemInfo.
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mauricio Salatino
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:40 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence -
WorkItemInfo Entity
Hmm .. for what I remember the variables if are configured to be persisted
using JPA using the Strategies, probably are externalized. Are you sure that
are not being persisted with variable persistence strategy rigth now?
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>
If “a” is correct – may be I can customize the “JPAWorkItemManager” for my
usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Vijay K Pandey
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo
Entity
I have a question related to the (*Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence*) on
the data that gets stored as part of the *
org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.*
* *
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy – and I pass a JPA
Entity(stored in its own table) to a *session.startProcess*(“”, map) and
map this entity variable to a parameter in the work item node – then this
entity will get stored in the WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized
form in the column (workItemByteArray). So if that is true we have got the
same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If “a” is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo – is
there somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo – so that it
doesn’t gets stored twice?
Thanks
Vijay
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
8:48 p.m.
New subject: Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
I just ran a test one having the JPA entity and another test without the JPA entity and
compared the 'workItemByteArray' - looks like they are same - so I guess these
variables are not saved again as part of workiteminfo.
Another question on this is there some good way to associate a JPA entity with the
workitem? Currently the association is only with the Process Instance Info? Is there any
work around to associate it with the WorkItemInfo - so that this JPA entity can be queried
through the 'work item info id'?
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Mauricio Salatino
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 5:47 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
I don't think so, I don't have the code here, but for what I remember all the
contextInstances that contains variables are scanned in order to expternalize the variable
persistence.
I will take a look at that when I have the code handy.
Greetings.
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey@mdes.ms.gov<mailto:VPandey@mdes.ms.gov>>
The JPA entity is getting stored properly in its own table through variable persistent
strategy - but will the same entity also get stored as part of the serialized form in the
column (workItemByteArray) of entity WorkItemInfo.
________________________________
From:
rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
On Behalf Of Mauricio Salatino
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:40 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
Hmm .. for what I remember the variables if are configured to be persisted using JPA using
the Strategies, probably are externalized. Are you sure that are not being persisted with
variable persistence strategy rigth now?
2009/11/18 Vijay K Pandey <VPandey@mdes.ms.gov<mailto:VPandey@mdes.ms.gov>>
If "a" is correct - may be I can customize the "JPAWorkItemManager"
for my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From:
rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
On Behalf Of Vijay K Pandey
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence) on the data that
gets stored as part of the org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a JPA Entity(stored in
its own table) to a session.startProcess("", map) and map this entity variable
to a parameter in the work item node - then this entity will get stored in the
WorkItemInfo table as a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo - is there
somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so that it doesn't gets stored
twice?
Thanks
Vijay
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
8:10 p.m.
It is correct that the WorkItemInfo object embeds the values of its
parameters. We coudl extend that the same way we do for process
instances and variables, to make sure you can use pluggable persistence
for work item parameters as well. I opened a JIRA for this:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2345
Kris
Quoting Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>:
If "a" is correct - may be I can customize the
"JPAWorkItemManager"
for my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Vijay K
Pandey
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence -
WorkItemInfo Entity
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence)
on the data that gets stored as part of the
org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a
JPA Entity(stored in its own table) to a session.startProcess("",
map) and map this entity variable to a parameter in the work item
node - then this entity will get stored in the WorkItemInfo table as
a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this
correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the WorkItemInfo
- is there somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so
that it doesn't gets stored twice?
Thanks
Vijay
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
9:52 a.m.
New subject: Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
Thanks Kris.
This will be wonderful as I have to associate some domain objects (JPA entities) at the
work item level.
Vijay
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Kris Verlaenen
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:10 PM
To: Rules Users List; Vijay K Pandey
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence - WorkItemInfo Entity
It is correct that the WorkItemInfo object embeds the values of its
parameters. We coudl extend that the same way we do for process
instances and variables, to make sure you can use pluggable persistence
for work item parameters as well. I opened a JIRA for this:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2345
Kris
Quoting Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>:
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
If "a" is correct - may be I can customize the
"JPAWorkItemManager"
for my usage? Am I on the right path or I am missing something.
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Vijay K
Pandey
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence -
WorkItemInfo Entity
I have a question related to the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Persistence)
on the data that gets stored as part of the
org.drools.persistence.processinstance.WorkItemInfo.
a) If I am using variable persistence strategy - and I pass a
JPA Entity(stored in its own table) to a
session.startProcess("",
map) and map this entity variable to a parameter in the work item
node - then this entity will get stored in the WorkItemInfo table as
a part of the serialized form in the column (workItemByteArray). So
if that is true we have got the same data stored twice? Is this
correct?
b) If "a" is true how can we avoid storing in the
WorkItemInfo
- is there somehow we can map the JPA entity to the WorkItemInfo - so
that it doesn't gets stored twice?
Thanks
Vijay
5482
days inactive
5487
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Kris Verlaenen -
Mauricio Salatino -
Vijay K Pandey