Hello, I have a list of very similar rules executed in Drools and some performance problems appear ... I want some advices to choose between two "direction" in order to correct them ... First the context : I have to execute always the same check but with different level or "parameters". For example, - in the first demand (rule for our client) i have to count and retrieve the list all Article that have a family code equals to 'A', 'B' or 'C' and execute the then clause only if there is 3 elements in the filtered list. - in the second demand (rule for our client) i have to count and retrieve the list all Article that have a family code equals to 'B' or 'C' and execute the then clause only if there is 4 elements in the filtered list and so on ... The number of different group of parameter values and the values of theses parameters will change over time ... The question is : is it more efficient to implement a lot of different rules, each with their parameter in the code OR is it more efficient to implement only one rule with an additional object as a drools fact containing different parameter's values ? Thanks for your help Sébastien

More efficient w.r;t runtime ! Actually, we generate (automatically by a batch) one rule for each demand (set of parameters), even if the demand use the same "template" than an other previous demand with other parameters, so code in rules seams to be very duplicated code at the exeption of parameters values ... For efficiency at runtime (in term of response time), we want to know if "code only one rule (with the parameter as a fact in when clause) and *not *generate different rules for different parameters" will be more efficient or not ? Regards Sébastien 2014-03-21 18:08 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com&gt;: > "More efficient" w.r.t. runtime, maintenance, development effort,...? > > Writing individual rules is quick, bad for maintenance, and probably > best, if a session has only a few inputs as it starts fast from a > precompiled rule base. > > Parameter facts take a little time for development, are very good for > maintenance (see below) and have a tolerable overhead if they are not > too numerous and/or the session runs long. > > What should be considered is that a set of parameter facts can be > maintained by non-technical personnel, e.g., in a spreadsheet or in > some other data preparation tool. This could be a boon for long-ter > maintenance. > > -W > > > On 21/03/2014, Seb Geek <geekseb(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a list of very similar rules executed in Drools and some > performance > > problems appear ... I want some advices to choose between two > > "direction" > > in order to correct them ... > > > > First the context : > > I have to execute always the same check but with different level or > > "parameters". > > For example, > > - in the first demand (rule for our client) i have to count and > > retrieve > > the list all Article that have a family code equals to 'A', 'B' or 'C' > and > > execute the then clause only if there is 3 elements in the filtered > > list. > > - in the second demand (rule for our client) i have to count and > > retrieve > > the list all Article that have a family code equals to 'B' or 'C' and > > execute the then clause only if there is 4 elements in the filtered > > list > > and so on ... > > > > The number of different group of parameter values and the values of > theses > > parameters will change over time ... > > > > The question is : is it more efficient to implement a lot of different > > rules, each with their parameter in the code OR is it more efficient to > > implement only one rule with an additional object as a drools fact > > containing different parameter's values ? > > > > Thanks for your help > > Sébastien > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >