3:06 p.m.
Wolfgang:
In the rule??
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
modify ( $oRecord1 ) { status = "Matched" };
modify ( $oRecord2 ) { status = "Matched" };
end
I get an error...
__obj__.status cannot be resolved or is not a field
Doesn't the setStatus calls just above update the object?
Thanks!
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 3:39 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Query query... (Dennis Duggan)
2. Re: Query query... (Wolfgang Laun)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:07 -0600
From: Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Query query...
To: "rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<121AF5D37A73F94E98B26D237302319E010A76863B(a)MBX04.exg5.exghost.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have a super interface, that both objects implement.
The matching rule looks like:
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
end
I can breakpoint right after running the query and I see objects with all statuses so the
matching rule is firing correctly.
Thanks!
Dennis
Dennis Duggan
Principal Software Engineer, Software Engineering
ESP Technologies Corp. "THE Buy-Side Solution"
One Indian Head Plaza Suite 701, Nashua, NH 03060
603.324.2444 ext. 1304 Office | 603.324.2447 Fax
dennis(a)esptechnologies.com
ESP Technologies, winner 2009 Red Herring North America 100 and 2008 Deloitte Technology
Fast 500.
This e-mail and/or attachments may contain privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. Unintended recipients should notify the sender immediately and delete.
Disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited.
Brokerage services provided by Electronic Securities Processing (ESP) LLC. Member FINRA,
SIPC. This is neither an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other
financial instrument. Email compliance(a)esptechnologies.com with questions regarding this
disclosure.
From: Dennis Duggan
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:55 PM
To: 'rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org'
Subject: Query query...
I have 2 types of objects in my knowledge base that I am trying to equate. Equality is
based on a number of different variables contained in the objects. Once I find equal
objects I set a status member in each to "Matched", otherwise it will be
"OneKnows" or "TwoKnows".
After I fire the rules I use queries that I call from Java code to get the three different
types of objects.
query "OneFirmKnows"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="OneKnows" )
end
query "TwoKnows"
oRecord : MyObject2( status=="TwoKnows" )
end
query "Matched"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="Matched" )
end
Each query sends back all objects no matter what the status is. The objects have a
getStatus( ) method. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
Dennis
3:09 p.m.
New subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
The correct syntax is
modify( $oRecord1 ) { setStatus( "Matched" ) };
On 9 November 2010 22:06, Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com> wrote:
Wolfgang:
In the rule??
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
modify ( $oRecord1 ) { status = "Matched" };
modify ( $oRecord2 ) { status = "Matched" };
end
I get an error...
__obj__.status cannot be resolved or is not a field
Doesn't the setStatus calls just above update the object?
Thanks!
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 3:39 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Query query... (Dennis Duggan)
2. Re: Query query... (Wolfgang Laun)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:07 -0600
From: Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Query query...
To: "rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<121AF5D37A73F94E98B26D237302319E010A76863B(a)MBX04.exg5.exghost.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have a super interface, that both objects implement.
The matching rule looks like:
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
end
I can breakpoint right after running the query and I see objects with all
statuses so the matching rule is firing correctly.
Thanks!
Dennis
Dennis Duggan
Principal Software Engineer, Software Engineering
ESP Technologies Corp. "THE Buy-Side Solution"
One Indian Head Plaza Suite 701, Nashua, NH 03060
603.324.2444 ext. 1304 Office | 603.324.2447 Fax
dennis(a)esptechnologies.com
ESP Technologies, winner 2009 Red Herring North America 100 and 2008
Deloitte Technology Fast 500.
This e-mail and/or attachments may contain privileged, confidential or
proprietary information. Unintended recipients should notify the sender
immediately and delete. Disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. Brokerage services provided by
Electronic Securities Processing (ESP) LLC. Member FINRA, SIPC. This is
neither an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other
financial instrument. Email compliance(a)esptechnologies.com with questions
regarding this disclosure.
From: Dennis Duggan
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:55 PM
To: 'rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org'
Subject: Query query...
I have 2 types of objects in my knowledge base that I am trying to equate.
Equality is based on a number of different variables contained in the
objects. Once I find equal objects I set a status member in each to
"Matched", otherwise it will be "OneKnows" or "TwoKnows".
After I fire the rules I use queries that I call from Java code to get the
three different types of objects.
query "OneFirmKnows"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="OneKnows" )
end
query "TwoKnows"
oRecord : MyObject2( status=="TwoKnows" )
end
query "Matched"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="Matched" )
end
Each query sends back all objects no matter what the status is. The
objects have a getStatus( ) method. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101109/ef70b46...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:38:56 +0100
From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Query query...
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTikxs+9XhVj2XNQzKDRFAgVa2Mai3fgBFFLtLaNM@mail.gmail.com<AANLkTikxs%2B9XhVj2XNQzKDRFAgVa2Mai3fgBFFLtLaNM(a)mail.gmail.com>
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
You don't call modify or update on $oRecord1/$oRecord2!
-W
2010/11/9 Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com>
> I have a super interface, that both objects implement.
>
>
>
> The matching rule looks like:
>
> *rule* "Match"
>
> *when*
>
> $oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
>
> $oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
>
> *then*
>
> $oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
>
> $oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> I can breakpoint right after running the query and I see objects with all
> statuses so the matching rule is firing correctly.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Dennis
>
> Dennis Duggan
>
> Principal Software Engineer, Software Engineering
>
> ESP Technologies Corp. "THE Buy-Side Solution*"*
>
> One Indian Head Plaza Suite 701, Nashua, NH 03060
>
> 603.324.2444 ext. 1304 Office | 603.324.2447 Fax
>
> dennis(a)esptechnologies.com
>
>
>
> *ESP Technologies, winner 2009 Red Herring North America 100 and 2008
> Deloitte Technology Fast 500*.**
>
> This e-mail and/or attachments may contain privileged, confidential or
> proprietary information. Unintended recipients should notify the sender
> immediately and delete. Disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
> e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. Brokerage services provided by
> Electronic Securities Processing (ESP) LLC. Member FINRA, SIPC. This is
> neither an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other
> financial instrument. Email compliance(a)esptechnologies.com with
questions
> regarding this disclosure.
>
>
>
> *From:* Dennis Duggan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:55 PM
> *To:* 'rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org'
> *Subject:* Query query...
>
>
>
> I have 2 types of objects in my knowledge base that I am trying to
equate.
> Equality is based on a number of different variables contained in the
> objects. Once I find equal objects I set a status member in each to
> ?Matched?, otherwise it will be ?OneKnows? or ?TwoKnows?.
>
>
>
> After I fire the rules I use queries that I call from Java code to get
the
> three different types of objects.
>
> *query* "OneFirmKnows"
>
> oRecord : MyObject1( status=="OneKnows" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> *query* "TwoKnows"
>
> oRecord : MyObject2( status=="TwoKnows" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> *query* "Matched"
>
> oRecord : MyObject1( status=="Matched" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> Each query sends back all objects no matter what the status is. The
> objects have a getStatus( ) method. What am I doing wrong?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101109/3712f2f...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
End of rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:17 p.m.
New subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
This merely changes the object:
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
The Engine is not aware of a change of this fact. Other rules depending on
this value will not fire, and queries will fail.
The usual way for updates is
modify( $varBoundToFact ){ setX(...), setY(),... }
You may also use
$varBoundToFact.setX(...);
update( $varBoundToFac );
(Another possibililty is to use PropertyChangeListener.)
-W
On 9 November 2010 22:06, Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com> wrote:
Wolfgang:
In the rule??
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
modify ( $oRecord1 ) { status = "Matched" };
modify ( $oRecord2 ) { status = "Matched" };
end
I get an error...
__obj__.status cannot be resolved or is not a field
Doesn't the setStatus calls just above update the object?
Thanks!
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 3:39 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Query query... (Dennis Duggan)
2. Re: Query query... (Wolfgang Laun)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:07 -0600
From: Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Query query...
To: "rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<121AF5D37A73F94E98B26D237302319E010A76863B(a)MBX04.exg5.exghost.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have a super interface, that both objects implement.
The matching rule looks like:
rule "Match"
when
$oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
$oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
then
$oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
$oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
end
I can breakpoint right after running the query and I see objects with all
statuses so the matching rule is firing correctly.
Thanks!
Dennis
Dennis Duggan
Principal Software Engineer, Software Engineering
ESP Technologies Corp. "THE Buy-Side Solution"
One Indian Head Plaza Suite 701, Nashua, NH 03060
603.324.2444 ext. 1304 Office | 603.324.2447 Fax
dennis(a)esptechnologies.com
ESP Technologies, winner 2009 Red Herring North America 100 and 2008
Deloitte Technology Fast 500.
This e-mail and/or attachments may contain privileged, confidential or
proprietary information. Unintended recipients should notify the sender
immediately and delete. Disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. Brokerage services provided by
Electronic Securities Processing (ESP) LLC. Member FINRA, SIPC. This is
neither an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other
financial instrument. Email compliance(a)esptechnologies.com with questions
regarding this disclosure.
From: Dennis Duggan
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:55 PM
To: 'rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org'
Subject: Query query...
I have 2 types of objects in my knowledge base that I am trying to equate.
Equality is based on a number of different variables contained in the
objects. Once I find equal objects I set a status member in each to
"Matched", otherwise it will be "OneKnows" or "TwoKnows".
After I fire the rules I use queries that I call from Java code to get the
three different types of objects.
query "OneFirmKnows"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="OneKnows" )
end
query "TwoKnows"
oRecord : MyObject2( status=="TwoKnows" )
end
query "Matched"
oRecord : MyObject1( status=="Matched" )
end
Each query sends back all objects no matter what the status is. The
objects have a getStatus( ) method. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101109/ef70b46...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:38:56 +0100
From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Query query...
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTikxs+9XhVj2XNQzKDRFAgVa2Mai3fgBFFLtLaNM@mail.gmail.com<AANLkTikxs%2B9XhVj2XNQzKDRFAgVa2Mai3fgBFFLtLaNM(a)mail.gmail.com>
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
You don't call modify or update on $oRecord1/$oRecord2!
-W
2010/11/9 Dennis Duggan <dennis(a)esptechnologies.com>
> I have a super interface, that both objects implement.
>
>
>
> The matching rule looks like:
>
> *rule* "Match"
>
> *when*
>
> $oRecord1 : MyObject1( )
>
> $oRecord2 : MyObject2(RefID==$oRecord1. RefID )
>
> *then*
>
> $oRecord1.setStatus( "Matched" );
>
> $oRecord2.setStatus( "Matched" );
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> I can breakpoint right after running the query and I see objects with all
> statuses so the matching rule is firing correctly.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Dennis
>
> Dennis Duggan
>
> Principal Software Engineer, Software Engineering
>
> ESP Technologies Corp. "THE Buy-Side Solution*"*
>
> One Indian Head Plaza Suite 701, Nashua, NH 03060
>
> 603.324.2444 ext. 1304 Office | 603.324.2447 Fax
>
> dennis(a)esptechnologies.com
>
>
>
> *ESP Technologies, winner 2009 Red Herring North America 100 and 2008
> Deloitte Technology Fast 500*.**
>
> This e-mail and/or attachments may contain privileged, confidential or
> proprietary information. Unintended recipients should notify the sender
> immediately and delete. Disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
> e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. Brokerage services provided by
> Electronic Securities Processing (ESP) LLC. Member FINRA, SIPC. This is
> neither an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other
> financial instrument. Email compliance(a)esptechnologies.com with
questions
> regarding this disclosure.
>
>
>
> *From:* Dennis Duggan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:55 PM
> *To:* 'rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org'
> *Subject:* Query query...
>
>
>
> I have 2 types of objects in my knowledge base that I am trying to
equate.
> Equality is based on a number of different variables contained in the
> objects. Once I find equal objects I set a status member in each to
> ?Matched?, otherwise it will be ?OneKnows? or ?TwoKnows?.
>
>
>
> After I fire the rules I use queries that I call from Java code to get
the
> three different types of objects.
>
> *query* "OneFirmKnows"
>
> oRecord : MyObject1( status=="OneKnows" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> *query* "TwoKnows"
>
> oRecord : MyObject2( status=="TwoKnows" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> *query* "Matched"
>
> oRecord : MyObject1( status=="Matched" )
>
> *end*
>
>
>
> Each query sends back all objects no matter what the status is. The
> objects have a getStatus( ) method. What am I doing wrong?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101109/3712f2f...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
End of rules-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 34
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:56 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
Hello all,
In Guvnor, the function export allows to dump the content of the
repository's assets in a xml file. Could somebody please point me towards
the pieces of code that allow this? More specifically, the code that allows
exporting rules and facts into xml?
Below is an example of rule exported in the repository_export.xml:
<sv:property sv:name="drools:content" sv:type="String">
<sv:value>
<rule> ... </rule>
</sv:value>
</sv:property>
All the best,
Pierre
10:41 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
pdl(a)agh.edu.pl wrote:
Hello all,
In Guvnor, the function export allows to dump the content of the
repository's assets in a xml file. Could somebody please point me towards
the pieces of code that allow this? More specifically, the code that allows
exporting rules and facts into xml?
Below is an example of rule exported in the repository_export.xml:
<sv:property sv:name="drools:content" sv:type="String">
<sv:value>
<rule> ... </rule>
</sv:value>
</sv:property>
All the best,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi, take a look into RulesRepoistory.java (drools-repository module),
for example dumpPacakgeFromRepositoryXML method. Its using JCR API
internally.
Cheers,
Jervis
10:35 a.m.
New subject: ODP: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
Thanks for the quick answer Jervis!
I couldn't find in the guvnor sources how the packages, rules and facts are
loaded into the RuleRepository. Is it placed somewhere else?
All the best,
Pierre
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] W imieniu Jervis Liu
Wysłano: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:41 AM
Do: Rules Users List
Temat: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
pdl(a)agh.edu.pl wrote:
Hello all,
In Guvnor, the function export allows to dump the content of the
repository's assets in a xml file. Could somebody please point me towards
the pieces of code that allow this? More specifically, the code that
allows
exporting rules and facts into xml?
Below is an example of rule exported in the repository_export.xml:
<sv:property sv:name="drools:content" sv:type="String">
<sv:value>
<rule> ... </rule>
</sv:value>
</sv:property>
All the best,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi, take a look into RulesRepoistory.java (drools-repository module),
for example dumpPacakgeFromRepositoryXML method. Its using JCR API
internally.
Cheers,
Jervis
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:49 p.m.
New subject: ODP: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
On 2010/11/11 0:35, Pierre de Leusse wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer Jervis!
I couldn't find in the guvnor sources how the packages, rules and facts are
loaded into the RuleRepository. Is it placed somewhere else?
Is this what you are looking for?
The importRepository() method in RulesRepoistory.java
(http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-reposito...)
Cheers,
Jervis
All the best,
Pierre
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] W imieniu Jervis Liu
Wysłano: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:41 AM
Do: Rules Users List
Temat: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
pdl(a)agh.edu.pl wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In Guvnor, the function export allows to dump the content of the
> repository's assets in a xml file. Could somebody please point me towards
> the pieces of code that allow this? More specifically, the code that
allows
> exporting rules and facts into xml?
>
> Below is an example of rule exported in the repository_export.xml:
>
> <sv:property sv:name="drools:content" sv:type="String">
> <sv:value>
> <rule> ...</rule>
> </sv:value>
> </sv:property>
>
> All the best,
> Pierre
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
Hi, take a look into RulesRepoistory.java (drools-repository module),
for example dumpPacakgeFromRepositoryXML method. Its using JCR API
internally.
Cheers,
Jervis
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
9:07 a.m.
New subject: ODP: ODP: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
After some research it seems that jackrabbit handles the
serialization/deserialization of the rules.
However, I cannot find how the rules are exported so nicely (with a nice XML
structure, with " lhs", "rhs" tags). If I use XStream to serialize a
RuleBase, org.drools.rule.Rule or org.drools.lang.descr.RuleDescr all I get
is a dirty - and not easily usable version - of the object.
Anybody could please point me towards this nice serialization?
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] W imieniu Pierre de Leusse
Wysłano: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:35 PM
Do: 'Rules Users List'
Temat: [rules-users] ODP: Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
Thanks for the quick answer Jervis!
I couldn't find in the guvnor sources how the packages, rules and facts are
loaded into the RuleRepository. Is it placed somewhere else?
All the best,
Pierre
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] W imieniu Jervis Liu
Wysłano: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:41 AM
Do: Rules Users List
Temat: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor repository_export.xml the code
pdl(a)agh.edu.pl wrote:
Hello all,
In Guvnor, the function export allows to dump the content of the
repository's assets in a xml file. Could somebody please point me towards
the pieces of code that allow this? More specifically, the code that
allows
exporting rules and facts into xml?
Below is an example of rule exported in the repository_export.xml:
<sv:property sv:name="drools:content" sv:type="String">
<sv:value>
<rule> ... </rule>
</sv:value>
</sv:property>
All the best,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi, take a look into RulesRepoistory.java (drools-repository module),
for example dumpPacakgeFromRepositoryXML method. Its using JCR API
internally.
Cheers,
Jervis
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5172
days inactive
5178
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Dennis Duggan -
Jervis Liu -
pdl＠agh.edu.pl -
Pierre de Leusse
-
Wolfgang Laun