Does anyone know if it's possible to use a ruleflow with a StatelessSession? The current documentation and API seem to show examples with StatefullSessions i.e.: statefullSession.startProcess(id); statefullSession.fireAllRules(); etc... However, there doesn't seem to be anything equivalent in the API for StatelessSesssion's. I'd really like to be able to use the new sequential mode (i.e. with a StatelessSession) and ruleflow. Regards, Shahad ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Mark, Thanks for the reply. Are there any plans to make this functionality available directly via the API, rather than having to add a "dummy" rule into a rulebase in order to get workflow to work with stateless sessions? I can see how to make the change myself to ReteooStatelessSession by adding a setRuleFlow method that sets a private processId instance that all the execute methods can start if set (I guess an unset method wouldn't be needed for stateless sessions). An alternative might be to add variants of the existing execute and executeWithResults that also takes a Ruleflow processid, but I think this would add too many variations of execute. I'll probably have to make this change to use drools with the current application I'm writing, as modifying the rules will not be an option - I'm happy to submit the changes if you think this is worthwhile. Shahad On 8/10/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: you would have to call drools.getWorkingMemory().startProcess(id) from inside of a consequence. Mark Shahad Ahmed wrote: > Does anyone know if it's possible to use a ruleflow with a > StatelessSession? > > The current documentation and API seem to show examples with > StatefullSessions i.e.: > > statefullSession.startProcess(id); > statefullSession.fireAllRules(); > etc... > > However, there doesn't seem to be anything equivalent in the API > for StatelessSesssion's. I'd really like to be able to use the > new sequential mode (i.e. with a StatelessSession) and ruleflow. > > Regards, > Shahad > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Hi Similarly can we set the focus on a particular agenda in stateless session. Like for statefull session, to fire the rules belonging to a given agenda, the code is : workingMemory.setFocus("agenda group name");

Do we have a similar method in stateless session as well?

Hi I am using StatelessSession code in Java file and my rules are in drl file. Which drools variable are you talking about? How can I use it in java file to set focus? Mark Proctor wrote: > > > The drools variable is available and you can get the working memory from > that. >> Do we have a similar method in stateless session as well? >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-do-you-use-Ruleflows-with-StatelessSession%27s-... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users