2012/3/7 Matteo Cusmai <cusmaimatteo(a)gmail.com>
From my experience, if you want call a method from then clause, it
has to
be static method.
Bye bye,
Surely you don't mean that only a "static method" can be called in a
consequence?!
Also, using 5.3.0 and 5.4.0.Beta2,.I had no problems with a consequence
modify( $ms ){ add( "three", "four" ) }
insert( new MySet( "x", "y" ) );
where both method add and constructor MySet have the signature (String...
strings)
But - as in many other situations - using
dialect "mvel"
is to be avoided.
-W
Matteo Cusmai
Il giorno 07/mar/2012 18:10, "womuji"
<cmregister(a)gmail.com> ha scritto:
We are upgrading Drools from 5.1 to 5.3, and running into some issue when
> invoking a Java method with
> String variable arguments:
>
> methodA(String... params)
>
> how do we invoke this in a drl file? We used to call it in 5.1 as:
>
> objA.methodA({"string1"});
>
> and it works fine. Now in 5.3, it complains that
>
> "unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
> objA.methodA([Ljava.lang.Object;)]"
>
> If we tried objA.methodA(new String[]{"string1"});
> it complains that
> "unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
> objA.methodA([Ljava.lang.String;)]"
>
> It passes the rule loading if we change to :
>
> objA.methodA("string1");
>
> but when actually running the rule, we are getting error saying
> " unable to resolve method methodA(java.lang.String)"
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/how-to-invoke-java-method-with-variable...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users