As fas as the released versions 5.5.0 and 5.5.1 are concerned, CEs
"not" and "exist" using constraints employing the four comparison
operators <, <=, >, >= are not safe to use if a retract changes the
nodes relating to these CEs.
Mario has fixed this, so it'll be gone in 5.6 and later.
-W
On 17/01/2013, John Smith <ffirstt.llastt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am new to Drools and am trying to get the sample program to work.
This
sample is given in the drools documentation
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/drools-expert-docs/html_....
This drool rule is expected to sort integers. I just changed the numbers
from what are given in the sample and they do not get sorted as expected.
Tried using drools version 5.5.0, 5.5.1 and the master 6.0.0, but got the
same wrong results.
Following is the main code:
package com.sample;
public class Example2 {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Number[] numbers = new Number[] { wrap(5), wrap(6), wrap(4),
wrap(1), wrap(2) };
new RuleRunner().runRules(new String[] { "Example3.drl" },
numbers);
}
private static Integer wrap(int i) {
return new Integer(i);
}
}
The RuleRunner class is the same as given in the example and I do not
think
I should give that here, since it will clutter the question. It simply
creates the KnowledgeBase, stateful session, inserts the facts as given in
the 'numbers' array above and then calls fireAllRules method on the
session.
The rule file (Example3.drl) is:
rule "Rule 04"
dialect "mvel"
when
$number : Number()
not Number(intValue < $number.intValue)
then
System.out.println("Number found with value: " + $number.intValue());
retract($number);
end
The output I get is as follows:
Loading file: Example3.drl
Inserting fact: 5
Inserting fact: 6
Inserting fact: 4
Inserting fact: 1
Inserting fact: 2
Number found with value: 1
Number found with value: 4
Number found with value: 2
Number found with value: 5
Number found with value: 6
Not the correct expected ascending sorted order.
What might I be doing wrong? I cannot imagine that the drools rule engine
would be broken at this basic level.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Expert-does-not-sort-integers-co...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users