1:40 a.m.
am sorry i understand partially. i don't know to use semaphores to control rule. can
you give some example
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:23:05 +0000
From: Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent
object
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <47321EA9.7060100(a)codehaus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
you'll have to setup rules that detect the state of the working memory
that then uses semaphores to control which rules can fire.
Mark
Sikkandar Nawabjan wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert always ObjectA with
ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the rule from A.drl
How to do that?
Thanks and Regs,
Basha
Sikkandar Basha
Tech Lead WPEPDS
UST Global<http://intranet.ustri.com/email/UST-logo.jpg> B5N 144, Bhavani
Technopark, Trivandrum, India
sikkandar.nawabjan(a)ust-global.com <mailto:sikkandar.nawabjan@ust-global.com>
T: +91-471-2335777 Extn: 6802036
M: +91-9946555330
F: +91-471-2527276
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org on behalf of
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thu 11/8/2007 5:21 AM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Adrian Cowham)
2. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Adrian)
3. RE: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Raj, Govinda (Mohan))
4. Re: RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent object
(Mark Proctor)
5. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Mike D)
6. Re: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Edson Tirelli)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:35:17 -0800
From: "Adrian Cowham" <adrian.cowham(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
<470fffa10711071035o4792e8ebs65c3d16551f10859(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE
isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
rule Grant Access"
when
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
$group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc), allowAccess == "false")
from $group.getRules())
then
# access granted
end
The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate to "all
access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that
allows
access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/451e832...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Adrian <adrian.cowham(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <loom.20071107T195056-299(a)post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Adrian Cowham <adrian.cowham <at> gmail.com> writes:
I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE isn't
working as expected. The rule I have is rule Grant Access"
when
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
$group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc), allowAccess == "false")
from $group.getRules())
then
# access grantedendThe issue I'm having is with
AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation == $loc),
allowAccess ==
"false"), this translate to "all access rules that have the allowed
location set
to ANY or set to the location the user is logging in from". I created a
UserGroup named "
super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a
single rule that allows
access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login
with "root"
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Please ignore this email, I sent this one by accident pre-maturely. I sent my
final draft shortly after. Sorry.
a
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:46:46 -0000
From: "Raj, Govinda (Mohan)" <mohan(a)hp.com>
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<4CE2D0FBADA2D04FB93A01341FA2CE5502B8019A(a)G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Try changing DSL
from
[consequence][]write "{value}" to
stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
To
[consequence][]write {value} to stdout=System.out.println( {value} );
And see if it works.
--Mohan
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Markus Helbig
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:09 AM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
Hi,
following example:
Item Class:
public class MyItem {
public MyItem() {}
public String getMessage()
{
return "Hello World!";
}
}
DSL:
[condition][]is of type MyItem=MyItem()
[consequence][]write "{value}" to
stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
DSRL File:
rule
when
$item: is of type MyItem
then
write $item.getMessage() to stdout
end
Is this "write $item.getMessage() to stdout" possible in any way?
Currently i'm not able to get it to work ...
Cheers
Markus
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4786 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/7f583b3...
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:23:05 +0000
From: Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent
object
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <47321EA9.7060100(a)codehaus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
you'll have to setup rules that detect the state of the working memory
that then uses semaphores to control which rules can fire.
Mark
Sikkandar Nawabjan wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert always ObjectA with
ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the rule from A.drl
How to do that?
Thanks and Regs,
Basha
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/04f8801...
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:36:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike D <mike.dalaker(a)kewill.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <13636646.post(a)talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
did you try AccessRule((allowedLocation in ("ANY", $loc)?
Adrian Cowham wrote:
>
> I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE
> isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
>
> rule Grant Access"
when
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
>
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
> $user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
> $group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
> $locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
> collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation
> == $loc), allowAccess == "false")
> from $group.getRules())
> then
> # access granted
>
> end
>
>
> The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate to
"all
> access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
> location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
> super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that
> allows
> access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/inconsistency-with-%27collect%27-and-the-%27%7C%7C%...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:50:36 -0200
From: "Edson Tirelli" <tirelli(a)post.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<e6dd5ba30711070850u5957090gf0fcb50c7fa5a9a1(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Markus, did you tried:
[consequence][]write {value} to stdout=System.out.println({value});
With the line:
write $item.getMessage() to stdout
[]s
Edson
2007/11/7, Markus Helbig <mhelbig81(a)googlemail.com>:
Hi,
following example:
Item Class:
public class MyItem {
public MyItem() {}
public String getMessage()
{
return "Hello World!";
}
}
DSL:
[condition][]is of type MyItem=MyItem()
[consequence][]write "{value}" to
stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
DSRL File:
rule
when
$item: is of type MyItem
then
write $item.getMessage() to stdout
end
Is this "write $item.getMessage() to stdout" possible in any way?
Currently i'm not able to get it to work ...
Cheers
Markus
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/fb33c17...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
End of rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
*******************************************
2:52 a.m.
New subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
Sikkandar,
regard a rule-semaphore as a "guard": It's a variable which you use
on left hand side of rules:
rule 1
when Guard g
<other conditions>
then
<RHS>
end
You can set the semaphore in any other rule to control which other
rules you want to disable or enable...
(If you need background on semaphores, have a look in Operating-
Systems literature)
regards,
Gernot
Am 08.11.2007 um 08:40 schrieb Sikkandar Nawabjan:
> am sorry i understand partially. i don't know to use semaphores to
> control rule. can you give some example
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:23:05 +0000
> From: Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent
> object
> To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Message-ID: <47321EA9.7060100(a)codehaus.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> you'll have to setup rules that detect the state of the working memory
> that then uses semaphores to control which rules can fire.
>
> Mark
> Sikkandar Nawabjan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
>>
>> ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
>>
>> ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
>>
>> when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
>>
>> when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only
>> from B.drl
>>
>> There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert
>> always ObjectA with ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the
>> rule from A.drl
>>
>> How to do that?
>>
>> Thanks and Regs,
>>
>> Basha
>>
>
>
> Sikkandar Basha
> Tech Lead WPEPDS
>
>
> UST Global<http://intranet.ustri.com/email/UST-logo.jpg> B5N 144,
> Bhavani
> Technopark, Trivandrum, India
> sikkandar.nawabjan(a)ust-global.com <mailto:sikkandar.nawabjan@ust-
> global.com>
> T: +91-471-2335777 Extn: 6802036
> M: +91-9946555330
> F: +91-471-2527276
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org on behalf of rules-users-
> request(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thu 11/8/2007 5:21 AM
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
>
>
>
> Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Adrian
> Cowham)
> 2. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator
(Adrian)
> 3. RE: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Raj, Govinda (Mohan))
> 4. Re: RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent object
> (Mark Proctor)
> 5. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Mike
D)
> 6. Re: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Edson Tirelli)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:35:17 -0800
> From: "Adrian Cowham" <adrian.cowham(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [rules-users] inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
> operator
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID:
> <470fffa10711071035o4792e8ebs65c3d16551f10859(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a
> collect CE
> isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
>
> rule Grant Access"
> when
> $request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID,
> $loc :
> accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
> $user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
> $group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
> $locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
> collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation
> == $loc), allowAccess == "false")
> from $group.getRules())
> then
> # access granted
>
> end
>
>
> The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate
> to "all
> access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
> location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
> super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule
> that allows
> access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
>
6258
days inactive
6258
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Dr. Gernot Starke -
Sikkandar Nawabjan