Vielen Dank für Ihre Email. Ich bin erst wieder erreichbar ab dem 16.08.2010 In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren Sie bitte Fr. Dr. Steinbach Email: steinbach(a)transdata.net Fon: +49 5206 9106 0 Thanks a lot for your email. I won't be reachable until August, 16th 2010. If your matters are really urgent please contact Mrs. Dr. Steinbach email: steinbach(a)transdata.net phone: +49 5206 9106 0 =================================================================== Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards Heiko Tappe Vielen Dank für Ihre Email. Ich bin erst wieder erreichbar ab dem 16.08.2010 In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren Sie bitte Fr. Dr. Steinbach Email: steinbach(a)transdata.net Fon: +49 5206 9106 0 Thanks a lot for your email. I won't be reachable until August, 16th 2010. If your matters are really urgent please contact Mrs. Dr. Steinbach email: steinbach(a)transdata.net phone: +49 5206 9106 0 =================================================================== Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards Heiko Tappe Vielen Dank für Ihre Email. Ich bin erst wieder erreichbar ab dem 16.08.2010 In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren Sie bitte Fr. Dr. Steinbach Email: steinbach(a)transdata.net Fon: +49 5206 9106 0 Thanks a lot for your email. I won't be reachable until August, 16th 2010. If your matters are really urgent please contact Mrs. Dr. Steinbach email: steinbach(a)transdata.net phone: +49 5206 9106 0 =================================================================== Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards Heiko Tappe That timer properties can not be changed dynamically is one thing. The other thing is that in the code that is executed each time a wait state timer fires, you seem to have no access to any process variables. Would you agree on this, Kris? If yes, is this planned to change in the future? I guess you could at least implement a wait state that continues after a variable delay if you could access variables in the timer code. Namely by updating some fact in the working memory i.e. influence the rule constraint of the wait state. I also tried signalling an event from within the wait state timer and update the working memory from a subsequent action node where I do have access to process variables. This although didn't work with me because of a strange NullPointerException... In case anyone is interested: Here is a small project with three approaches for a wait state node that continues after a variable delay. Neither of them works, but maybe someone can fix that... Reto http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n989829/demo.var... demo.variableTimer.zip -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/how-to-access-process... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users