Ok, I will try option 1 first.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Either:
1) add a hard constraint to penalize what you don't want
2) look into ValueRangeProvider from entity (see docs), which effectively
makes it a build-in hard constraint.
3) Use Filtering in both the Local Search selectors as the CH selectors
(but the CH selector usage is not yet documented).
This 3) option is very difficult, especially for SwapMove's.
I recommend 1) by default.
Also don't expect that CH's give you a feasible solution, use LS on top of
CH's to get a good, feasible solution.
See "phase overview" section in the docs.
On 03-11-13 17:29, Tales Costa wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to Optaplanner and would like some help on understanding how to
control the planning value chosen by Optaplanner.
Based on the info on User Guide and the NQueen example, I understand
that for Local Search algorithms one can use the Move interface (for
example to forbid some specific row change).
However, for the Construction heuristics have not found any similar
option. For these algoritms the only option seems to be to make load
adjustements on the score calculations (as the nqueens example does for
queens on the same row). Is this correct or am I missing something ?
Regards
Tales
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users