Alright!
Concerning the package declaration, it is mentioned as "optional" (see
Example 5.3. Rule template file: templates) in the documentation.
Thanks for your answer!
Regards,
Bruno.
Le 03/11/2011 16:27, Wolfgang Laun a écrit :
It seems that some template/CSV parser expects the parameters in the
same order as the column headers of the CSV. Also, there is no
explicit termination of the parameter list, and therefore the parser
appears to rely on "package" being the first statement of the header
text to precede all expansions.
At least, it should be documented.
-W
2011/11/3 Bruno Freudensprung <bruno.freudensprung(a)temis.com
<mailto:bruno.freudensprung@temis.com>>
Hi Wolfgang,
Sure. Please find attached a small Maven/Eclipse project
containing 3 DRT and 3 unit test cases (Java in
src/test/java/org/drools/bug, rules in
src/test/resource/org/drools/bug) :
* Test1OK(.java/.drt/.csv) is the one working well
* Test1KO(.java/.drt/.csv) is the one illustrating the 1) behavior
* Test1KO2(.java/.drt/.csv) is the one illustrating the 2)
behavior
Regards,
Bruno.
Le 03/11/2011 14:07, Wolfgang Laun a écrit :
> Before you work on a JIRA could you please provide an
> (abbreviated) example of a template that causes both errors?
> -W
>
> 2011/11/3 Bruno Freudensprung <bruno.freudensprung(a)temis.com
> <mailto:bruno.freudensprung@temis.com>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing rules using Drools Templates and I noticed
> strange problems (ocurring when I slightly modify a DRT that
> works well):
>
> 1. the template instanciation depends on the declarations
> order of the parameters in the template header
> 2. if the rule template does not contain a package
> declaration (default package) the instanciation of the
> template fails
>
> I am working with Drools 5.1.1 but those problems occur in
> 5.2.0.Final and in 5.3.0.Final as well.
> Do you think it is worth posting a JIRA?
>
> Anyway let me tell you that Drools Templates are great! Our
> users like that feature a lot! They start writing a rule in
> DRL format and, once it works, they transform it into a DRT
> and put data into a tsv file. It is quite a natural way of
> working. The general perception here is that it is easier to
> "templatize" an existing DRL than to write a decision table
> from scratch.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bruno.
>
> PS:
>
> _DRT that works well_:
>
> template header
> *name
> message
>
> package templates;
> *
> import org.drools.bug.Entity;
>
> template "TestTemplate"
> rule "Test1 @{row.rowNumber}"
> dialect "mvel"
> when
> Entity( $name : name == "@{name}" )
> then
> System.out.println("@{message}" + $name);
> insert($name);
> end
> end template
>
> _DRT that does not work_ (first case):
>
> template header
> *message
> name
>
> package templates;
> *
> import org.drools.bug.Entity;
>
> template "TestTemplate"
> rule "Test1 @{row.rowNumber}"
> dialect "mvel"
> when
> Entity( $name : name == "@{name}" )
> then
> System.out.println("@{message}" + $name);
> insert($name);
> end
> end template
>
>
> _DRT that does not work_ (second case):
>
> template header
> *name
> message
> *
> import org.drools.bug.Entity;
>
> template "TestTemplate"
> rule "Test1 @{row.rowNumber}"
> dialect "mvel"
> when
> Entity( $name : name == "@{name}" )
> then
> System.out.println("@{message}" + $name);
> insert($name);
> end
> end template
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users