try RULEFLOW-GROUP
it should be superior to AGENDA-GROUP
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Evans, Jess <JEvans(a)collegeboard.org> wrote:
Thanks. Is it missing because declaring agenda group in decision
table
rules is a stupid thing to do because of X, or was it simply overlooked?
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michal Bali
*Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2008 8:26 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] decision tables - no agenda group?
I don't think there is.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Evans, Jess <JEvans(a)collegeboard.org>
wrote:
Sorry, would someone validate that there's no agenda group support in the
decision table functionality?
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Evans, Jess
*Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2008 10:06 PM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] decision tables - no agenda group?
It doesn't appear that the decision table parser supports an agenda-group
declaration. I find this odd since the documentation says it supports
activation and ruleflow. Can someone validate this?
thanks,
-Jess
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users