Yes, but I don't want all the rules to fire, right. You told me the drools will take care of what the rules to fire based on the request. This is what you told " But a rule (as you have it) with Drug( brandName == "AndroGel" ) will take care of that automaticaliy. This can co-exist with lots of similar rules for anything between "Aspic" to "Zodiac". " But it is firing all the rules for AndroGel, Aspic and also Zodiac. If the rules are satisfied for AndroGel rule file, then it should stop the execution and carry on from the calling method which is fireAllRules(). This is what I want. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-fire-rules-of-a-specific-rule-fi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Ok, for my rule files, the facts for all the rules are same. That is the problem. I guess I have to merge everything into one rule file. So can a rule have multiple ruleFlow Group, something like this. rule ruleflow-group A,B,... when //condition then //consequence end Because I have a business requirement, that puts a rule into multiple ruleflow-group. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-fire-rules-of-a-specific-rule-fi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 21/08/2012, Rana <ven12344(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: I don't see the reason why this should be so. No, not possible. You can't have such a "business requirement", sinc agenda or activation groups are a technical feature, and it would be an error to put this in a "business requirement". Stop thinking in "groups" - what is the requirement really? -W

I would say to have a Map<String, KBase> where the keys are "AndroGel", "Another Thing", etc and the value is the kbase containing only the rules that apply to that particular product. Best Regards XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Esteban Aliverti - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Rana <ven12344(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: