why don't you check the condition in the then clause ? rule "Rule1" when message1 : Message( message == "Hello" ) || message2 : Message( status == 0 ) then if (message2.getStatus == 0) { System.out.println("status is 0."); } if (message1.getMessage().equals("Hello") { System.out.println("message is hello."); } System.out.println("then executed"); End -Krishnan. Hi, I have also sent this problem before. But did not get any reply. It is urgent. Does anyone know about this? Suppose I have a rule as rule "Rule1" when Message( message == "Hello" ) || Message( status == 0 ) then System.out.println("then executed"); End Is there a way to find out which condition is satisfied? I.e. whether message was equal to "Hello" or status was 0. We are generating alerts using rules engine, and in the alert we need to specify that which clause generated the alert. We are having multiple clauses in a single rule. So what is the correct way to find the clause because of which alert is generated. We cannot keep them in separate rule because we need to consider and\or conditions between these clauses. Thanks, Ashwini DISCLAIMER ========== This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Pvt. Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Pvt. Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users On 6/11/07, Ashwini Joshi <ashwini_joshi(a)persistent.co.in&gt; wrote: -- Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) Never assume the obvious is true. - William Safire