On 03/12/2010 03:16, Zeke wrote:
I tried it. 5.1.1 also not works.
As this is using a nested
accessor it would be an MVEL bug. I would
create a failing test for MVEL and submit a bug:
"sec.fir.i == 2147483647"
The MVEL author will not fix things unless there is a jira with a
failing test to prove it's a bug.
You can see lots of sample MVEL tests here:
http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/Java-Document/Scripting/mvel/org/mvel/t...
If it was a direct accessor then it would be evaluate with the Drools
evuluators, it might be good to check that those are ok too, or if they
are bugged:
sec.i == 2147483647
Mark
Thanks!
2010/11/22 Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>
On 22/11/2010 01:03, Zeke wrote:
> Why int need be cast to BigInteger? 2147483647 is a valid int
> value. In normal java program, if a is a int variable, and assign
> its value to 2147483647, a == 2147483647 is true.
Try this on 5.1, see if it works there first.
Mark
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> 2010/11/19 Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>
>
> On 19/11/2010 01:34, Zeke wrote:
>> Can anyone help me?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On 16 November 2010 09:57, Zeke <xanadu860122(a)gmail.com
>> <mailto:xanadu860122@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm using Drools 4.0.7. I find "==" operator does
not
>> work for big int value (like 2147483647). The condition
>> is like "sec.fir.i == 2147483647". I attach my test
>> code. With my simple testing, it seems that it does not
>> work for comparsion with int constant from 1000000001 to
>> 2147483647. Is it a bug of drools? I have already tested
>> long and BigInteger do not have this kind of problem.
>>
> I suspect Drools 4.0.x did n't have big integer and big
> decimal coercion.
>
> Mark
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users