5:26 p.m.
Good evening,
I am porting our project from Drools 5.1 to Drools 5.2 and I am running into
a couple of issues. Most I solved except:
It seems that our global variable is being completely ignored.
I have declared the following after package & imports :
global java.util.Date now;
When calling it in a rule:
rule "MyRule"
when
EXPRESSION >= now.time
then
// things to do
end
Then I get the following error at 'compile' time :
Not possible to directly access the property 'time' of declaration 'now'
since it is not a pattern
I do not know what to make of it.
I have tried to change it to now.getTime() without success.
Thank you in advance for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-using-global-variable-with-Drools...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12:15 a.m.
On 23 September 2011 00:26, Slorg1 <slorg1(a)percipiomedia.com> wrote:
global java.util.Date now;
When calling it in a rule:
rule "MyRule"
when
EXPRESSION >= now.time
then
// things to do
end
This comparison isn't in an eval CE or within a pattern? As it is written it
can't be correct, global or no global.
-W
7:54 a.m.
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for answering, here is the rule rewritten but closer to reality:
// package
// imports
global java.util.Date now;
rule "MyRule"
salience 5
when
// Prevent rule activation for other offer types.
MyObject(type == Type.TYPE_SOUGHT)
$candidate : Candidate(
subObject.dateField != null && subObject.dateField.time >=
now.time)
then
// do something
end
A value for 'now' being set like so:
session.setGlobal("now", new Date()); // Date being the java.util.Date.
But I do not think that matters because 'compilation' fails at this point.
Thank you in advance for your time.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-using-global-variable-with-Drools...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
9:16 a.m.
If it a java.util.Date then drools supports comparing them out of the box so you can just
do subObjcet.dateField >= now.
Just make sure you don't mix up instances of java.util.Date and java.sql.Timestamp (eg
if you have jpa code fetching object from the db) as sun in their wisdom made it that you
can't compare them with each other!
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Slorg1
Sent: 23 September 2011 13:54
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Issue using global 'variable' with Drools 5.2 in DRL
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for answering, here is the rule rewritten but closer to reality:
// package
// imports
global java.util.Date now;
rule "MyRule"
salience 5
when
// Prevent rule activation for other offer types.
MyObject(type == Type.TYPE_SOUGHT)
$candidate : Candidate(
subObject.dateField != null && subObject.dateField.time >=
now.time)
then
// do something
end
A value for 'now' being set like so:
session.setGlobal("now", new Date()); // Date being the java.util.Date.
But I do not think that matters because 'compilation' fails at this point.
Thank you in advance for your time.
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-
using-global-variable-with-Drools-5-2-in-DRL-tp3360343p3361770.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please
do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
10:04 a.m.
Please follow Thomas' advice.
That now.time worked in 5.1.1 was actually an "accident", as it
contradicted the specs. I'm not sure whether this behaviour is going to be
reinstated.
If you do need to do the comparison on long (milliseconds since the epoch)
values you'd have to do
subObject.dateField.time >= (now.getTime())
which works in 5.1.1, 5.2.0 and 5.3.0.so.far. (Being able to omit the
parentheses was promised for 5.2.0; hopefully we'll have it in 5.3.0.)
-W
On 23 September 2011 14:54, Slorg1 <slorg1(a)percipiomedia.com> wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for answering, here is the rule rewritten but closer to reality:
// package
// imports
global java.util.Date now;
rule "MyRule"
salience 5
when
// Prevent rule activation for other offer types.
MyObject(type == Type.TYPE_SOUGHT)
$candidate : Candidate(
subObject.dateField != null && subObject.dateField.time >=
now.time)
then
// do something
end
A value for 'now' being set like so:
session.setGlobal("now", new Date()); // Date being the java.util.Date.
But I do not think that matters because 'compilation' fails at this point.
Thank you in advance for your time.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-using-global-variable-with-Drools...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:13 a.m.
Hi,
Thank you guys, it now works (at least that part) for me!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-using-global-variable-with-Drools...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4814
days inactive
4815
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Slorg1 -
Swindells, Thomas -
Wolfgang Laun