That syntax was deprecated. Use "or" and "and" between patterns,
and use
"&&" and "||" inside patterns between constraints. Also, the
single binding
for "or" uses () if I am not mistaken:
core : ( BWCore(systemId == "1" ) or
BWCore(systemId == "2" ) or
BWCore(systemId == "3") )
Finally, although that was the way to do it in Drools 3, it is terribly
inefficient compared to the Drools 4/5 constraint connectives. The same
condition above should be re-written in one of the following, much more
efficient, ways:
core : BWCore( systemId in ("1", "2", "3" ) )
core : BWCore( systemId == "1" || == "2" || == "3" )
core : BWCore( systemId == "1" || systemId == "2" || systemId ==
"3" )
[]s
Edson
2010/3/24 Nars <narayanan.anantharaman(a)citi.com>
To add more to the above, the error comes only when we bind the matched
object and use it in consequence. If we do not use the matched object in
consequence, it works fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-upgrade-from-3-to-5-OR-syntax-tp471205p471332...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @
www.jboss.com