7:26 a.m.
Hello,
I have a question because insertLogical does not behave as I expected.
Here is the example I use; I have a class 'cat' that is dynamic (JavaBean with
PropertyChangeSupport ) with only a 'name' attribute.
Then I have following rule:
rule "test"
when
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
then
$cat.setName("cat");
insertLogical(new String("test"));
end
When I test the rule against a cat named tom, the logical inserted fact is not retracted.
(So the fact is inserted because the rule matches, but is not retracted even if the rule
is no more matching at the end.)
If I change the order of the RHS, it works fine. The fact is inserted and then retracted.
rule "test"
when
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
then
insertLogical(new String("test"));
$cat.setName("cat");
end
Is that the normal behavior ?
-Patrick
Patrick Gras
GENERALI Assurances
Service Informatique
Avenue Perdtemps 23
1260 Nyon 1
Tél. direct: +41 58 471 05 87
<mailto:patrick.gras@generali.ch>
P Please consider the environment before printing this E-Mail!
1:29 p.m.
Sounds like a bug to me. The order of the statements should not cause any
change in the behavior.
Can you please open a JIRA for it attaching your test case?
Thanks
Edson
2008/5/8 Gras, Patrick <Patrick.Gras(a)generali.ch>:
Hello,
I have a question because insertLogical does not behave as I expected.
Here is the example I use; I have a class 'cat' that is dynamic (JavaBean
with PropertyChangeSupport ) with only a 'name' attribute.
Then I have following rule:
*rule* "test"
* when*
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
* then*
$cat.setName("cat");
* insertLogical*(*new* String("test"));
*end*
When I test the rule against a cat named tom, the logical inserted fact is
not retracted. (So the fact is inserted because the rule matches, but is not
retracted even if the rule is no more matching at the end.)
If I change the order of the RHS, it works fine. The fact is inserted and
then retracted.****
*rule* "test"
* when*
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
* then*
* insertLogical*(*new* String("test"));
$cat.setName("cat");
*end*
Is that the normal behavior ?
-Patrick
*Patrick Gras*
*GENERALI Assurances*
Service Informatique
Avenue Perdtemps 23
1260 Nyon 1
Tél. direct: +41 58 471 05 87
*<mailto:patrick.gras@generali.ch <patrick.gras(a)generali.ch>>*
P***** Please consider the environment before printing this E-Mail!***
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
2:31 p.m.
New subject: Multiple Action
All
I'm trying set up multiple action in a decision table.
RuleTable setCalculateRate
CONDITION
ACTION
ACTION
myData:CalcData
myData
comboboxPPTAL1 == "$1"
setCalculatedRate("$1")
setCalculatedPremium( myData.getTotalUnits() * $1 )
Radius input
Calculated Rate
Calculated Rate
A
18
18
B
50
50
C
100
100
But validation fails with :
unknown:1:9 mismatched token '[@2,9:9='<',<79>,1:9]' expecting
set null
unknown:1:33 mismatched token: [@8,33:33='<',<79>,1:33]; expecting type
RIGHT_PAREN
Any help would be appreciated.
Carl.
2:44 p.m.
New subject: Multiple Action
You need to put a semicolon ; at the end of each ACTION statement.
- irving -
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Cabou, Carl
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:31 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Multiple Action
All
I’m trying set up multiple action in a decision table.
RuleTable setCalculateRate
CONDITION
ACTION
ACTION
myData:CalcData
myData
comboboxPPTAL1 == "$1"
setCalculatedRate("$1")
setCalculatedPremium( myData.getTotalUnits() * $1 )
Radius input
Calculated Rate
Calculated Rate
A
18
18
B
50
50
C
100
100
But validation fails with :
unknown:1:9 mismatched token '[@2,9:9='<',<79>,1:9]' expecting
set null
unknown:1:33 mismatched token: [@8,33:33='<',<79>,1:33]; expecting type
RIGHT_PAREN
Any help would be appreciated.
Carl.
7:38 a.m.
Thanks for your answer, I've openend following JIRA:
<http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1602>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1602
-Patrick
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org]De la
part de Edson Tirelli
Envoyé : jeudi, 8. mai 2008 20:29
À : Rules Users List
Objet : Re: [rules-users] Question about insertLogical
Sounds like a bug to me. The order of the statements should not cause any change in the
behavior.
Can you please open a JIRA for it attaching your test case?
Thanks
Edson
2008/5/8 Gras, Patrick <Patrick.Gras(a)generali.ch>:
Hello,
I have a question because insertLogical does not behave as I expected.
Here is the example I use; I have a class 'cat' that is dynamic (JavaBean with
PropertyChangeSupport ) with only a 'name' attribute.
Then I have following rule:
rule "test"
when
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
then
$cat.setName("cat");
insertLogical(new String("test"));
end
When I test the rule against a cat named tom, the logical inserted fact is not retracted.
(So the fact is inserted because the rule matches, but is not retracted even if the rule
is no more matching at the end.)
If I change the order of the RHS, it works fine. The fact is inserted and then retracted.
rule "test"
when
$cat:Cat( name == "tom" )
then
insertLogical(new String("test"));
$cat.setName("cat");
end
Is that the normal behavior ?
-Patrick
Patrick Gras
GENERALI Assurances
Service Informatique
Avenue Perdtemps 23
1260 Nyon 1
Tél. direct: +41 58 471 05 87
< mailto:patrick.gras@generali.ch>
P Please consider the environment before printing this E-Mail!
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
6045
days inactive
6050
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Cabou, Carl -
Edson Tirelli -
Gras, Patrick -
Irving Reid