+1 And IMO if we need some specific features for testing it should be
implemented here :
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>wrote:
+1 On dropping it.
On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Good morning peeps, regarding this thread
>
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandonin....
> Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app
>
http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2...
> .
>
> I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app:
>
> - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag
> security
> - Maintain it is very time consuming
> - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the
> app will be disabled
>
> That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update
> our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to
> hear the concerns from the team about it.
>
> If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift.
> If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it.
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev