+1 On dropping it. On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, regarding this thread > http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandonin.... > Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app > http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2... > . > > I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app: > > - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag > security > - Maintain it is very time consuming > - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the > app will be disabled > > That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update > our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to > hear the concerns from the team about it. > > If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. > If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it. > > -- > abstractj > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I understand the issues and problems but that brings the topic how are we going to demo, let's say in iOS cookbook features that involved server part? TODO app were used to demo Pipe. I cross reference TODO app in here: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook#table-of-content Something raised in this thread http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Android-multipart-... ++ Corinne On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > +1 On dropping it. > > > On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, regarding this thread http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandonin.... Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2.... > > I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app: > > - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag security > - Maintain it is very time consuming > - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the app will be disabled > > That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to hear the concerns from the team about it. > > If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it. > > -- > abstractj > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Hi Corinne, My idea is move all we need to example apps and integration test for a new server project or use aerogear-jaxrs-demo -- Daniel Passos On December 5, 2013 at 10:52:12 AM, Corinne Krych (corinnekrych(a)gmail.com) wrote: > I understand the issues and problems but that brings the topic how are we going to demo, let's say in iOS cookbook features that involved server part? > TODO app were used to demo Pipe. I cross reference TODO app in here: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook#table-of-content > > Something raised in this thread > http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Android-multipart-... > > ++ > Corinne > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > +1 On dropping it. > > > > > > On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Good morning peeps, regarding this thread http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandonin.... Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2.... > > > > I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app: > > > > - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag security > > - Maintain it is very time consuming > > - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the app will be disabled > > > > That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to hear the concerns from the team about it. > > > > If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it. > > > > -- > > abstractj > > > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me <mailto:daniel@passos.me>> wrote: > Hi Corinne, > > My idea is move all we need to example apps and integration test for > a new server project or use aerogear-jaxrs-demo +1 > > -- > Daniel Passos > > On December 5, 2013 at 10:52:12 AM, Corinne Krych > (corinnekrych(a)gmail.com <mailto://corinnekrych@gmail.com>) wrote: > >> I understand the issues and problems but that brings the topic how >> are we going to demo, let's say in iOS cookbook features that >> involved server part? >> TODO app were used to demo Pipe. I cross reference TODO app in here: >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook#table-of-content >> >> Something raised in this thread >> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Android-multipart-... >> >> >> ++ >> Corinne >> >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius >> <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> > +1 On dropping it. >> > >> > >> > On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj(a)redhat.com <mailto:abstractj@redhat.com>> wrote: >> > Good morning peeps, regarding this threadhttp://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-aba.... >> Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app >> http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2.... >> >> > >> > I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app: >> > >> > - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag security >> > - Maintain it is very time consuming >> > - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the app will be disabled >> > >> > That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to hear the concerns from the team about it. >> > >> > If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it. >> > >> > -- >> > abstractj >> > >> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aerogear-dev mailing list >> &gt;aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aerogear-dev mailing list >> &gt;aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Good morning peeps, regarding this thread http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandonin.... Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%2.... I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app: - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag security - Maintain it is very time consuming - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the app will be disabled That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to hear the concerns from the team about it. If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it. -- abstractj JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev