this is likely no longer relevant (see related threads on UPS proposal)
Any other thoughts, around "push content" for GSoC ?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
Folks, anybody is more than welcome to give feedback on this.
it may be the new arch for the UPS.next :-)
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> For UPS.next, I've drafted this:
>
>
https://gist.github.com/matzew/159e8ac444822b5509aff0f908d0bdc5
>
> It's a good step forward, and in the long run, these modules will also
> help to easily replace some parts of the server, e.g. rewrite the
"sender"
> in go
>
> Any thoughts ?
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> github:
https://github.com/matzew
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
github:
https://github.com/matzew
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
github:
https://github.com/matzew
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf