Re: [aerogear-dev] JIRA driven roadmaps

I like the roadmap JIRA view +1 to have only JIRA ++ Corinne > On 02 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > Hi, > > on our homepage ([1]) we have some handwritten docs that cover the roadmap for parts of our components. These roadmaps contain a duplication of content that is available in JIRA. Since this content is handwritten, it's often not as up-to-date as it should be. Here are a few examples: > > * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGeariOS/ > * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearAndroid/ > * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearCordova/ > > Basically the contain incorrect dates and duplicate the list of effected JIRAs. But I wonder why we even do have these handwritten docs? > > JIRA itself has a roadmap overview, which looks nice and clean: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jir... > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.j... > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGCORDOVA/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira... > > Since we track our issues, versions and releases in JIRA the above roadmaps comes for free. Now, when we change a release date in JIRA, using the above links as our roadmaps means we don't need to update the handwritten doc:-) > > Any thoughts? > > -Matthias > > [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/ > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev