+1 Make totally sense
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Howdy!
Going over the code I recalled that right now we somewhat nail the
device-type for SimplePush clients down to just 'web' (see [1] and [2]).
However w/ the new Java-Client, [3], (e.g. for desktop environments) it
would be pretty stupid to 'require' the 'web' there as well.
Instead of coming up w/ something else, I'd propose handle it like we do
Android/iOS.
Basically: Feel free to register your device with a device-type what ever
you are up to; Use the same for the sending/querying part, if it fits your
backend/model.
Any thoughts?
Greetings,
Matthias
[1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-...
[2]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/src/m...
[3]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-simplepush-java-client
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev