On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Matze, =) > > quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. it's the third :) our Pipe API is already here: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md The datamanager proposal is here: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... > > I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled upon the > method with 2 blocks. > > It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with 2 block > params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params if > necessary. I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I used that underneath our 'http communication' facility; (see pipeline/pipe API) I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) Not sure... > I forked your gist for better explanation: https://gist.github.com/3838469 > > As i said - it`s really more a personal flavor thing - don`t mind. > So keep up the work - going to have a deeper look and if i got time i will > make a test. Elmar, thanks for the feedback -Matthias > > Cheers Elmar > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-Auth-API-for-l... > Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Hi, For what is worth, I prefer the current approach with the two callbacks. Kind of more familiar with that pattern. Regards, Christos On 6 Οκτ 2012, at 1:51 μ.μ., Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hey, > > I tend to continue using two callbacks: One for 'success' and one for > the error case. > > Any objections? > > Greetings, > Matthias > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; wrote: >>> Hi Matze, =) >>> >>> quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. >> >> it's the third :) >> our Pipe API is already here: >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md >> >> The datamanager proposal is here: >> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... >> >>> >>> I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled upon the >>> method with 2 blocks. >>> >>> It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with 2 block >>> params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params if >>> necessary. >> >> I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I used >> that underneath our 'http communication' facility; >> (see pipeline/pipe API) >> >> >> I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of >> completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) >> Not sure... >> >> >>> I forked your gist for better explanation: https://gist.github.com/3838469 >>> >>> As i said - it`s really more a personal flavor thing - don`t mind. >>> So keep up the work - going to have a deeper look and if i got time i will >>> make a test. >> >> >> Elmar, thanks for the feedback >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >>> >>> Cheers Elmar >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-Auth-API-for-l... >>> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Quick update... I slightly changed the AuthModule protocol, by exposing two properties: - url (against where the auth module is mapped)

- type (e.g. REST etc) https://gist.github.com/3833333 -M On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > any other comments ? > > -M > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For what is worth, I prefer the current approach with the two callbacks. Kind of more familiar with that pattern. >> >> Regards, >> Christos >> >> On 6 Οκτ 2012, at 1:51 μ.μ., Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> I tend to continue using two callbacks: One for 'success' and one for >>> the error case. >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Matthias >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> Hi Matze, =) >>>>> >>>>> quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. >>>> >>>> it's the third :) >>>> our Pipe API is already here: >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md >>>> >>>> The datamanager proposal is here: >>>> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled upon the >>>>> method with 2 blocks. >>>>> >>>>> It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with 2 block >>>>> params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params if >>>>> necessary. >>>> >>>> I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I used >>>> that underneath our 'http communication' facility; >>>> (see pipeline/pipe API) >>>> >>>> >>>> I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of >>>> completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) >>>> Not sure... >>>> >>>> >>>>> I forked your gist for better explanation: https://gist.github.com/3838469 >>>>> >>>>> As i said - it`s really more a personal flavor thing - don`t mind. >>>>> So keep up the work - going to have a deeper look and if i got time i will >>>>> make a test. >>>> >>>> >>>> Elmar, thanks for the feedback >>>> >>>> >>>> -Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers Elmar >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-Auth-API-for-l... >>>>> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Oct 8, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Kris Borchers wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> Quick update... I slightly changed the AuthModule protocol, by >> exposing two properties: >> - url (against where the auth module is mapped) > > Wouldn't you want to use baseURL and endpoint instead? That is what I have done for all of my rest adapters so far. I prefer that too -- qmx _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

thanks ! did update, we now have (besides the type) these properties: - baseURL - loginEndpoint - logoutEndpoint - enroleEndpoint

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> Quick update... I slightly changed the AuthModule protocol, by >> exposing two properties: >> - url (against where the auth module is mapped) > > Wouldn't you want to use baseURL and endpoint instead? That is what I have done for all of my rest adapters so far. > >> - type (e.g. REST etc) >> >> https://gist.github.com/3833333 >> >> -M >> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> any other comments ? >>> >>> -M >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> For what is worth, I prefer the current approach with the two callbacks. Kind of more familiar with that pattern. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Christos >>>> >>>> On 6 Οκτ 2012, at 1:51 μ.μ., Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> I tend to continue using two callbacks: One for 'success' and one for >>>>> the error case. >>>>> >>>>> Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> Matthias >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Matze, =) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. >>>>>> >>>>>> it's the third :) >>>>>> our Pipe API is already here: >>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md >>>>>> >>>>>> The datamanager proposal is here: >>>>>> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled upon the >>>>>>> method with 2 blocks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with 2 block >>>>>>> params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params if >>>>>>> necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I used >>>>>> that underneath our 'http communication' facility; >>>>>> (see pipeline/pipe API) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of >>>>>> completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) >>>>>> Not sure... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I forked your gist for better explanation: https://gist.github.com/3838469 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As i said - it`s really more a personal flavor thing - don`t mind. >>>>>>> So keep up the work - going to have a deeper look and if i got time i will >>>>>>> make a test. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Elmar, thanks for the feedback >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers Elmar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-Auth-API-for-l... >>>>>>> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

lol :-) Brain still in soccer stadium? ;-) On Monday, October 8, 2012, Douglas Campos wrote: > > > On Oct 8, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > thanks ! > > > > did update, we now have (besides the type) these properties: > > - baseURL > > - loginEndpoint > > - logoutEndpoint > > - enroleEndpoint > English nit, enrollEndpoint? > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Quick update... I slightly changed the AuthModule protocol, by > >>> exposing two properties: > >>> - url (against where the auth module is mapped) > >> > >> Wouldn't you want to use baseURL and endpoint instead? That is what I > >> have done for all of my rest adapters so far. > >> > >>> - type (e.g. REST etc) > >>> > >>> https://gist.github.com/3833333 > >>> > >>> -M > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > >>> <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >>>> any other comments ? > >>>> > >>>> -M > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christos Vasilakis > >>>> <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> For what is worth, I prefer the current approach with the two > >>>>> callbacks. Kind of more familiar with that pattern. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Christos > >>>>> > >>>>> On 6 Οκτ 2012, at 1:51 μ.μ., Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I tend to continue using two callbacks: One for 'success' and one > >>>>>> for > >>>>>> the error case. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Greetings, > >>>>>> Matthias > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf > >>>>>> <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hi Matze, =) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> it's the third :) > >>>>>>> our Pipe API is already here: > >>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The datamanager proposal is here: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled > >>>>>>>> upon the > >>>>>>>> method with 2 blocks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with > >>>>>>>> 2 block > >>>>>>>> params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params > >>>>>>>> if > >>>>>>>> necessary. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I > >>>>>>> used > >>>>>>> that underneath our 'http communication' facility; > >>>>>>> (see pipeline/pipe API) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of > >>>>>>> completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) > >>>>>>> Not sure... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I forked your gist for better explanation: > >>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/3838469-- qmx > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Sent from Gmail Mobile

any other comments ?

-M On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > For what is worth, I prefer the current approach with the two callbacks. Kind of more familiar with that pattern. > > Regards, > Christos > > On 6 Οκτ 2012, at 1:51 μ.μ., Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I tend to continue using two callbacks: One for 'success' and one for >> the error case. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Greetings, >> Matthias >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Elmar Kretzer <elkr(a)symentis.com&gt; wrote: >>>> Hi Matze, =) >>>> >>>> quite fast enroll of the first API version - congratulations. >>> >>> it's the third :) >>> our Pipe API is already here: >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/API.md >>> >>> The datamanager proposal is here: >>> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-DataManager-St... >>> >>>> >>>> I just had a quick look at your gists - and i then i stumbled upon the >>>> method with 2 blocks. >>>> >>>> It`s more like a personal flavor thing but sometimes methods with 2 block >>>> params can look quite disturbing. So i tend to use up to 3 params if >>>> necessary. >>> >>> I was following the pattern from the AFNetworking folks, since I used >>> that underneath our 'http communication' facility; >>> (see pipeline/pipe API) >>> >>> >>> I think I generally don't mind one single block - but instead of >>> completion, I'd prefer completionHandler :) >>> Not sure... >>> >>> >>>> I forked your gist for better explanation: https://gist.github.com/3838469 >>>> >>>> As i said - it`s really more a personal flavor thing - don`t mind. >>>> So keep up the work - going to have a deeper look and if i got time i will >>>> make a test. >>> >>> >>> Elmar, thanks for the feedback >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers Elmar >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-iOS-Auth-API-for-l... >>>> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev