Hi, I was wondering about something... the list: * iOS * Android * Web * Hybrid Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc.... I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-) So my 'politically correct' list would be like: * Android * Hybrid * iOS * Web does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect 'misinterpretations' ? -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Good point previous site was listed as: *JS * iOS * android * hybrid which I think was a good order because it's ordered per category web vs native. I didn't really pay attention to the changes order tbh, let's fix! ++ Corinne On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: on the site :-) http://staging.aerogear.org/ On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering about something... > > the list: > * iOS > * Android > * Web > * Hybrid > > Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has higher > prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc.... > > I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-) > > So my 'politically correct' list would be like: > * Android > * Hybrid > * iOS > * Web > > > does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect > 'misinterpretations' ? > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Well, IMO iOS should go to the end of the list because it sucks, just kidding. Agreed about ordering by alphabet. Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering about something... > > the list: > * iOS > * Android > * Web > * Hybrid > > Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has > higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc.... > > I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-) > > So my 'politically correct' list would be like: > * Android > * Hybrid > * iOS > * Web > > > does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect > 'misinterpretations' ? > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- abstractj _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I also just saw the merged PR that went back to original order. Let's just leave it that way. No need to nitpick ourselves to death on this. On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I think the original order came from the fact that the JS bits were the first to be released. I think listing in alpha order makes sense. > > On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > >> Well, IMO iOS should go to the end of the list because it sucks, just >> kidding. >> >> Agreed about ordering by alphabet. >> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering about something... >>> >>> the list: >>> * iOS >>> * Android >>> * Web >>> * Hybrid >>> >>> Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has >>> higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc.... >>> >>> I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-) >>> >>> So my 'politically correct' list would be like: >>> * Android >>> * Hybrid >>> * iOS >>> * Web >>> >>> >>> does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect >>> 'misinterpretations' ? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> -- >> abstractj >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I kinda like * Web * Android * iOS * Hybrid

Which in my mind is matches to * Open, * "open"

* closed, * both/either. On 08/13/2013 05:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I was wondering about something... the list: * iOS * Android * Web * Hybrid Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc.... I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-) So my 'politically correct' list would be like: * Android * Hybrid * iOS * Web does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect 'misinterpretations' ? -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev