+1 Let's plan that for the 0.4.0 release On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the Java Client has an odd group/artifactId: > > <groupId>org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush</groupId> > <artifactId>unified-push-java-client</artifactId> > > > While the other libraries use "org.jboss.aerogear" as groupId, and > something like "aerogear-xyz" as their artifactId; > > The groupId change is not hard, I'd vote to also change it to > "org.jboss.aerogear". > > Regarding the artifactId, I think that "aerogear-unifiedpush-java-client" > is pretty much a mouthful, so I think I'd prefer "unifiedpush-java-client" > > Any thoughts ? > > -Matthias > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev