April 2015 - aerogear-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Ivan Gürtler

Hi, we use two AG unified push servers with Oracle DB in cluster, but we have some problem with deadlock (probably caused by clean up by both servers at the same time). We used DB owner PUSHSRVAG and application DB account APUSHSRVAG. (version ... my fork (with small change in dev) ... https://github.com/IvanGurtler/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/MyBranch) Is possible change some settings to prevent deadlock ? or some different solution ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** SESSION ID:(84.48937) 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** CLIENT ID:() 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** CLIENT DRIVER:(jdbcthin) 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** ACTION NAME:() 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 *** 2015-04-10 00:00:04.506 DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 ) See Note 60.1 at My Oracle Support for Troubleshooting ORA-60 Errors [Transaction Deadlock] The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a deadlock due to user error in the design of an application or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following information may aid in determining the deadlock: Deadlock graph: ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)--------- Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits TM-00013891-00000000-00000000-00000000 142 84 SX SSX 144 162 SX SSX TM-00013891-00000000-00000000-00000000 144 162 SX SSX 142 84 SX SSX Rows waited on: Session 84: no row Session 162: no row ----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions ----- Session 162: sid: 162 ser: 54036 audsid: 10790094 user: 115/APUSHSRVAG flags: (0x41) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC pid: 144 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 11534420 image: oracle@s16000ks client details: O/S info: user: jbotp, term: unknown, ospid: 1234 machine: s1.sk.srv.acc.sys program: JDBC Thin Client application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660 current SQL: delete from PUSHSRVAG.PushMessageInformation where submitDate<:1 ----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions ----- Information for THIS session: ----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=bsk109wpq55yg) ----- delete from PUSHSRVAG.PushMessageInformation where submitDate<:1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks *Mgr. Ivan Gürtler* Mobile software developer AHEAD iTec, s.r.o., Botanická 554/68a, 602 00 Brno (Czech Republic) www.ahead-itec.com | twitter <https://www.twitter.com/AHEADiTec> | mobile security solutions

7 years, 11 months

2
6
0 / 0

inactive apns device id notifications in aerogear UPS

by scottyedinb

using aerogear unified push (to push via apns), is there a mechanism by which the caller can be notified that the device Id has become inactive? and that it should look to obtain a new device id? -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/inactive-apns-device-id-notific... Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

7 years, 11 months

3
4
0 / 0

Team Meeting

by Christos Vasilakis

Agenda: http://oksoclap.com/p/aerogear-team-mgt-04.13.2015

7 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[UPS] Advanced Analytics

by Sebastien Blanc

Folks ! For AGPUSH-969[1] and to kick off the discussions, I started a small POC mainly focused on the backend. To sum up quickly : we want to know how many installations/users has opened the application after that a Push Notification has been touched. So, the very first thing that had to be done was to give the Push Notification a unique identifier, so that we can track it and do the metrics on it. For that, I have been using an existing model object that we have , the PushMessageInformation[2], and that is currently used to provide information for our dashboard. This object has now some extra fields, like a appOpenCounter etc ... The ID of this PushMessageInformation is now passed into the payload of the Push Message, just before we send it, this way the client library can use this ID to pass extra information to the UPS when a notification is touched. For this POC, I hijacked the cordova-helloworld, so that it extracts the ID from the payload and pass it as header when registering. When the UPS receive the request, it looks for the header and if it exist it updates the existing PushMessageInformation instance. Please note, that for this POC, all is happening on Application level and not on Variant level but that can be easily changed. It depends on how fined grained we want to have these analytics. I did a small screencast that shows this in action : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PseBBJZLz6s&feature=youtu.be The UPS branch containing the changes is here (the 2 latests commits are relevant) : https://github.com/sebastienblanc/aerogear-unified-push-server/tree/analy... The client app is not really relevant since I really hacked badly the app (and the push plugin) ;) , however if interested I may share it. Now, let's discuss :) Sebi [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-969 [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model...

7 years, 11 months

7
26
0 / 0

Aerodoc

by Денис Карпенко

Hello everyone. I'd like to figure out with Aerodoc and I need help :) I tried to launch AeroDoc, but I have a some problems with deploying backend[1]. I used command mvn clean install jboss-as:deploy , however page localhost:8080/aerodoc is not exist. What should I do to launch it? Denis. [1]: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-backend-cookbook/tree/master/aerodoc...

7 years, 11 months

2
3
0 / 0

Fwd: License Key for AeroGear UnifiedPush Server (was: Re: do we want swagger for REST endpoint documentation?)

by Matthias Wessendorf

Hi Yves, thanks a lot! Idel, below is the license key - I saw (looking at your Tika link) it needs to be included on the pom.xml file. Cheers, Matthias ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Yves Vandewoude <yves.vandewoude(a)miredot.com> Date: Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:07 AM Subject: Re: License Key for AeroGear UnifiedPush Server (was: Re: [aerogear-dev] do we want swagger for REST endpoint documentation?) To: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> Hello Matthias, The licence key for the AeroGear UnifiedPush Server project is: <licence>cHJvamVjdHxvcmcuamJvc3MuYWVyb2dlYXIudW5pZmllZHB1c2gudW5pZmllZHB1c2gtamF4cnN8MjAxNy0wNS0wMXx0cnVlfC0xI01Dd0NGQitaa0VVRVlsaU9LQjljR2h5TWNSWm1VMTREQWhRbUlHOXY3MExCR0FoT2FubklFSER2SWl1OVZnPT0=</licence> It is valid for two years (until May 1st 2017) for org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush / unifiedpush-jaxrs After that, you are free to request a new licence key. We continuously aim to improve our tool, so do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or remarks. Support questions are best sent to support(a)miredot.com, since they are dealt with by a team instead of just me :) Kind regards, Yves Matthias Wessendorf schreef op 9/04/2015 om 9:46: Hi Miredot team, for the AeroGear UnifiedPush Server ([1], [2]), we would like to start using miredot for our jaxrs endpoints ([3]). The Maven groupId is "org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush" and the artifactId is "unifiedpush-jaxrs". Currently we are using jaxrs-doclet ([4]), but we are not happy with that. The Server is an OpenSource project with regular releases, and it is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. For this project we would like to request an opensource license. Thanks, Matthias [1] https://aerogear.org/push/#unifiedpush [2] https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/index/ [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/jaxrs [4] https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/overview-index.... On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, so I will wait a license key from you. > > 2015-04-07 14:55 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> IMO, custom annotations force you to duplicate code and documentation. >>> Take a look at a more detailed example: >>> >>> @POST >>> @Path("/{petId}") >>> @Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED}) >>> @ApiOperation(value = "Updates a pet in the store with form data", >>> consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED) >>> @ApiResponses(value = { >>> @ApiResponse(code = 405, message = "Invalid input")}) >>> public Response updatePetWithForm ( >>> @ApiParam(value = "ID of pet that needs to be updated", required = true)@PathParam("petId") String petId, >>> @ApiParam(value = "Updated name of the pet", required = false)@FormParam("name") String name, >>> @ApiParam(value = "Updated status of the pet", required = false)@FormParam("status") String status) { >>> System.out.println(name); >>> System.out.println(status); >>> return Response.ok().entity(new com.wordnik.swagger.sample.model.ApiResponse(200, "SUCCESS")).build(); >>> } >>> >>> It is much more simple with MireDot (also because javadoc could be >>> generated automatically by IDE): >>> >>> /** >>> * Updates a pet in the store with form data. >>> * >>> * @param petId ID of pet that needs to be updated >>> * @param name Updated name of the pet >>> * @param status Updated status of the pet >>> */ >>> @POST >>> @Path("/{petId}") >>> @Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED}) >>> public Response updatePetWithForm (@PathParam("petId") String petId, >>> @FormParam("name") String name, >>> @FormParam("status") String status) { >>> System.out.println(name); >>> System.out.println(status); >>> return Response.ok().entity(new com.wordnik.swagger.sample.model.ApiResponse(200, "SUCCESS")).build(); >>> } >>> >>> Really, I don't know why Swagger is so popular :) >>> >> >> That's quite a difference, and less verbose and less of duplication >> (DRY). So I'd say, let's try Miredot :-) >> >> Thanks for the valuable info, Idel! >> >> -Matthias >> >> >>> >>> 2015-04-07 14:11 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, Swagger can generate doc on the fly, but Swagger use its own >>>>> annotations instead of parse JAX-RS annotations and javadoc, like MireDot. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, I think I have not a huge concern against custom annotations, >>>> especially due to the wide adoption of Swagger. >>>> I guess it's just a very tiny JAR, that contains the annotations, right? >>>> >>>> (+ the build time tool dependency for processing) >>>> >>>> >>>>> What about licence: Apache Tika, for example, uses pro version of >>>>> MireDot >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/5fbc56cca94b9da0a914e82dd466abb139f9e... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for the example, that's helpful >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2015-04-07 13:48 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>>>> >>>>>> Swagger allows doc on the source as well, right ? Just wondering. >>>>>> >>>>>> REgarding license, I need to double check on that before... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, I will work on it. >>>>>>> But I think that it would be better if you request a license [1] on >>>>>>> your email and forward it to me. >>>>>>> It won't be a problem to use a free version, but pro version has a >>>>>>> very cool features, like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Display javadoc comments for the fields of json payloads and >>>>>>> enums >>>>>>> - JSON field documentation >>>>>>> - Type replacement (custom serialisation, JSON types) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please, request a li >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://miredot.com/price/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-04-07 12:44 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Idel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> would you mind to create a branch for us, so we can investigate >>>>>>>> the MireDot solution? also the build should be working w/ JDK8. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ATM we use jax-doclet ([1]) which does not work w/ JDK 8 - but it >>>>>>>> does not really use any fancy annotations (e.g. see [2]) - that's why we >>>>>>>> picked it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] http://fromage.github.io/jax-doclets/docs/0.10.0/html/ >>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree with Idel that DRY approach in Miredot's case seems more >>>>>>>>> appealing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They offer basic docs generation in Free version, but also Pro >>>>>>>>> version for open-source projects under conditions that Aerogear meets [1]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ~ Lukas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.miredot.com/price/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ne 5. 4. 2015 v 20:00 odesílatel Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>>>>>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> napsal: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For JAX-RS I prefer use MireDot as a REST API doc generator >>>>>>>>>> http://www.miredot.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> With MireDot you do not need to use additional annotations, >>>>>>>>>> like @Api: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Path("/pet") >>>>>>>>>> @Api(value = "/pet", description = "Operations about pets") >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It will parse your JAX-RS annotation and pure javadoc: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /** >>>>>>>>>> * Operations about pets >>>>>>>>>> */ >>>>>>>>>> @Path("/pet") >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and generate beautiful and user friendly documentation, like >>>>>>>>>> this: http://www.miredot.com/exampledocs/ >>>>>>>>>> Swagger example: http://petstore.swagger.io/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And MireDot is free for open source projects! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Think about this alternative for Swagger. I'm able to prepare >>>>>>>>>> Pull Request for UPS next week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2015-04-04 9:43 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2015, at 18:53, Andrea Vibelli wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > we are using it in Project Newcastle with annotations on the >>>>>>>>>>>> > endpoints, and >>>>>>>>>>>> > it's really handy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All the JBoss ON 3.2+ and RHQ REST-docs are generated from >>>>>>>>>>>> JAX-RS + >>>>>>>>>>>> Swagger annotations. >>>>>>>>>>>> In Hawkular we are basically doing the same, but with a >>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>> annotation processor. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1000 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> we are, atm, doing similar: >>>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs... >>>>>>>>>>> result: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/sender/index.ht... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but the jaxrs doclet does not work w/ JDK8 - something has to >>>>>>>>>>> change here ;-) >>>>>>>>>>> So, I am all for using Swagger annotations on the code to >>>>>>>>>>> generate the HTML docs :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I personally think the best is really to have the annotations >>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>> source and not trying >>>>>>>>>>>> to update a separate .yml file, as the latter usually is much >>>>>>>>>>>> easier >>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten. >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>>>>>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >>>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

7 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

License Key for AeroGear UnifiedPush Server (was: Re: do we want swagger for REST endpoint documentation?)

by Matthias Wessendorf

Hi Miredot team, for the AeroGear UnifiedPush Server ([1], [2]), we would like to start using miredot for our jaxrs endpoints ([3]). The Maven groupId is "org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush" and the artifactId is "unifiedpush-jaxrs". Currently we are using jaxrs-doclet ([4]), but we are not happy with that. The Server is an OpenSource project with regular releases, and it is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. For this project we would like to request an opensource license. Thanks, Matthias [1] https://aerogear.org/push/#unifiedpush [2] https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/index/ [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/jaxrs [4] https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/overview-index.... On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, so I will wait a license key from you. > > 2015-04-07 14:55 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> IMO, custom annotations force you to duplicate code and documentation. >>> Take a look at a more detailed example: >>> >>> @POST >>> @Path("/{petId}") >>> @Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED}) >>> @ApiOperation(value = "Updates a pet in the store with form data", >>> consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED) >>> @ApiResponses(value = { >>> @ApiResponse(code = 405, message = "Invalid input")}) >>> public Response updatePetWithForm ( >>> @ApiParam(value = "ID of pet that needs to be updated", required = true)@PathParam("petId") String petId, >>> @ApiParam(value = "Updated name of the pet", required = false)@FormParam("name") String name, >>> @ApiParam(value = "Updated status of the pet", required = false)@FormParam("status") String status) { >>> System.out.println(name); >>> System.out.println(status); >>> return Response.ok().entity(new com.wordnik.swagger.sample.model.ApiResponse(200, "SUCCESS")).build(); >>> } >>> >>> >>> It is much more simple with MireDot (also because javadoc could be >>> generated automatically by IDE): >>> >>> /** >>> * Updates a pet in the store with form data. >>> * >>> * @param petId ID of pet that needs to be updated >>> * @param name Updated name of the pet >>> * @param status Updated status of the pet >>> */ >>> @POST >>> @Path("/{petId}") >>> @Consumes({MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED}) >>> public Response updatePetWithForm (@PathParam("petId") String petId, >>> @FormParam("name") String name, >>> @FormParam("status") String status) { >>> System.out.println(name); >>> System.out.println(status); >>> return Response.ok().entity(new com.wordnik.swagger.sample.model.ApiResponse(200, "SUCCESS")).build(); >>> } >>> >>> Really, I don't know why Swagger is so popular :) >>> >> >> That's quite a difference, and less verbose and less of duplication >> (DRY). So I'd say, let's try Miredot :-) >> >> Thanks for the valuable info, Idel! >> >> -Matthias >> >> >>> >>> 2015-04-07 14:11 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, Swagger can generate doc on the fly, but Swagger use its own >>>>> annotations instead of parse JAX-RS annotations and javadoc, like MireDot. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, I think I have not a huge concern against custom annotations, >>>> especially due to the wide adoption of Swagger. >>>> I guess it's just a very tiny JAR, that contains the annotations, right? >>>> >>>> (+ the build time tool dependency for processing) >>>> >>>> >>>>> What about licence: Apache Tika, for example, uses pro version of >>>>> MireDot >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/5fbc56cca94b9da0a914e82dd466abb139f9e... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for the example, that's helpful >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2015-04-07 13:48 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>>>> >>>>>> Swagger allows doc on the source as well, right ? Just wondering. >>>>>> >>>>>> REgarding license, I need to double check on that before... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, I will work on it. >>>>>>> But I think that it would be better if you request a license [1] on >>>>>>> your email and forward it to me. >>>>>>> It won't be a problem to use a free version, but pro version has a >>>>>>> very cool features, like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Display javadoc comments for the fields of json payloads and >>>>>>> enums >>>>>>> - JSON field documentation >>>>>>> - Type replacement (custom serialisation, JSON types) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please, request a li >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://miredot.com/price/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-04-07 12:44 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Idel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> would you mind to create a branch for us, so we can investigate the >>>>>>>> MireDot solution? also the build should be working w/ JDK8. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ATM we use jax-doclet ([1]) which does not work w/ JDK 8 - but it >>>>>>>> does not really use any fancy annotations (e.g. see [2]) - that's why we >>>>>>>> picked it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] http://fromage.github.io/jax-doclets/docs/0.10.0/html/ >>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree with Idel that DRY approach in Miredot's case seems more >>>>>>>>> appealing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They offer basic docs generation in Free version, but also Pro >>>>>>>>> version for open-source projects under conditions that Aerogear meets [1]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ~ Lukas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.miredot.com/price/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ne 5. 4. 2015 v 20:00 odesílatel Idel Pivnitskiy < >>>>>>>>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> napsal: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For JAX-RS I prefer use MireDot as a REST API doc generator >>>>>>>>>> http://www.miredot.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> With MireDot you do not need to use additional annotations, like >>>>>>>>>> @Api: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Path("/pet") >>>>>>>>>> @Api(value = "/pet", description = "Operations about pets") >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It will parse your JAX-RS annotation and pure javadoc: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> /** >>>>>>>>>> * Operations about pets >>>>>>>>>> */ >>>>>>>>>> @Path("/pet") >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and generate beautiful and user friendly documentation, like >>>>>>>>>> this: http://www.miredot.com/exampledocs/ >>>>>>>>>> Swagger example: http://petstore.swagger.io/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And MireDot is free for open source projects! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Think about this alternative for Swagger. I'm able to prepare >>>>>>>>>> Pull Request for UPS next week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2015-04-04 9:43 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Heiko W.Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2015, at 18:53, Andrea Vibelli wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > we are using it in Project Newcastle with annotations on the >>>>>>>>>>>> > endpoints, and >>>>>>>>>>>> > it's really handy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All the JBoss ON 3.2+ and RHQ REST-docs are generated from >>>>>>>>>>>> JAX-RS + >>>>>>>>>>>> Swagger annotations. >>>>>>>>>>>> In Hawkular we are basically doing the same, but with a >>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>> annotation processor. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1000 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> we are, atm, doing similar: >>>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/ >>>>>>>>>>> blob/master/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/ >>>>>>>>>>> unifiedpush/rest/sender/PushNotificationSenderEndpoint >>>>>>>>>>> .java#L99-L102 >>>>>>>>>>> result: >>>>>>>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush- >>>>>>>>>>> rest/sender/index.html#POST >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but the jaxrs doclet does not work w/ JDK8 - something has to >>>>>>>>>>> change here ;-) >>>>>>>>>>> So, I am all for using Swagger annotations on the code to >>>>>>>>>>> generate the HTML docs :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I personally think the best is really to have the annotations >>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>> source and not trying >>>>>>>>>>>> to update a separate .yml file, as the latter usually is much >>>>>>>>>>>> easier >>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten. >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>>>>>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >>>>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Quick survey

by Andres Galante

This is off topic: The patternfly team is having a booth at deviation, and apart from the usual shirts and stickers we want to give away a bigger item (or a bunch of them). We came up with a list, can you help us decide: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2KVZNQL Thanks!

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Team Meeting

by Christos Vasilakis

Hi all, since some of our member's are currently on Easter holiday, we decided to pause our regular meeting for today until tomorrow same time. Agenda is here: http://oksoclap.com/p/aerogear-team-mgt-04.07.2015 Thanks, Christos

7 years, 11 months

1
1
0 / 0

do we want swagger for REST endpoint documentation?

by Stefan Miklosovic

Hello, Is there any interest to describe REST API for UPS in a Swagger? (1),(2) I can imagine it would be pretty handy for folks, it is just one yaml file to write really. It could be somehow linked in UPS web page, swagger is just pure html + js without any dependencies at all. (1) http://swagger.io/ (2) http://petstore.swagger.io/#!/pet/deletePet -- Stefan Miklosovic Red Hat Brno - JBoss Mobile Platform e-mail: smikloso(a)redhat.com irc: smikloso

7 years, 11 months

10
24
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

aerogear-dev April 2015