7:10 a.m.
Good morning peeps, after the latest change[1] correct me if I'm wrong. But
I think KC and UPS will do pretty much what we need.
We have a push admin and the super user on KC side enabled. Let me know
if that is what you need and I will take a look at viewer role.
[1] -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/3e118b1c75...
On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Just a thought... regarding those two roles 'PushAdmin' and
'Super-User',
IMO the Super-user should be able to see all apps (and their variants,
including registered devices).
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
> Thank you Matthias, I will look at it and return back with more
> questions if necessary.
>
> On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > yes - the handling is done by Keycloak itself; Last time we looked at
> user
> > management, we had the following in terms of roles:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605
> >
> > Not sure the names of these roles are great.... let's see
> >
> > Basically I think the role definition in the gist still addresses most of
> > what we want to archive:
> > * super-user: in charge of managing the UPS realm (including users); can
> > see _ALL_ push applications (that's the admin in Sebi's gist)
> > * PushAdmin: Someone that can manage applications and variants, but is
> not
> > able to add new users; he also sees only his applications/variants etc
> > (that's the developer in sebis gist)
> >
> > The gist also contains a 'Viewer' role - At this point I am not sure
we
> do
> > really need this. My impression is that if we have PushAdmins for our
> 1.0.0
> > community release that will be enough.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org
> >wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning peeps,
> > >
> > > Before I jump in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-639. I would
> > > like to understand what do you guys want say with this issue.
> > >
> > > Currently Keycloak already has its own user/roles managements. What do
> > > you guys are looking for? Any specific requirements?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > abstractj
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj