On Feb 24, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0600, Kris Borchers wrote:
> At the same time, I am leery of leaving it in if iOS and Android don't
> have something similar since this feature was not thoroughly
> discussed. I would hate to leave this in, only to have to deprecate it
> in a later release for something that we decide works better for all
> libs.
How do you feel about node.js stability indication on APIs? Perhaps we
could borrow some inspiration there (and this filter API would be
experimental then)
So I like this idea in theory. I have a couple of concerns.
We're talking about a specific method here which is a pretty detailed place to mark
something experimental. At the same time, I wouldn't want to mark all of DataManager
as experimental just because of one method.
Related to #1, we would then have to go through and give a stability rating to every
method of every piece of AeroGear and maintain that for every new feature, method, etc.
We would need to document our index somewhere similar to
http://nodejs.org/api/documentation.html#documentation_stability_index
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev