+1
On Jun 29, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+1
On Jun 29, 2013, at 7:11, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
+1
-
abstractj
On Jun 29, 2013, 8:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Ha!
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> To finish this task I'd like to create two repositories on our GitHub
> organization:
>
> - aerogear-parent[1] (contains the parent pom)
> - aerogear-misc[2] (contains license header templates + code formatting
> rules)
>
> Here follows a proper example[3] of the optimizations we can have by
> using this parent pom.
>
> Any objections?
>
Not at all. I like it. Gave some feedback/PRs on your repos
>
> Thanks!
>
> [
1]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-parent
> [
2]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-misc
> [
3]:https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android/pull/76
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev