On Mon 03 Feb 2014 09:41:25 AM EST, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
Just catching up on all this, but I think this looks good.
One quick note, I did not pay THAT much attention to what the server
needs to have.
I think it may be "good enough" for a 0.1.0 to have the protocol
defined and the server be just an RI instead of a full product for a
bit.
On 3 February 2014 15:33, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com
<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
> So This should be all of the JIRAs (epics plus sub tasks)
>
> *
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1428?jql=project%20%3D%20AEROGEA...
>
> Now we need to figure out things like versions, release dates,
project
> specific JIRAs, etc.
>
> Me PERSONALLY I think that
> *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1405 and
> *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1409
>
those look pretty good and i think we have some of POC'd already
> leave us in a great place for a 0.1.0 release. It will have enough
> stuff done that we can say "yes this a product" but isn't so
feature
> rich that we get bogged down in minutia.
>
> WDYT?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev